Is the Interval [a,b] Sequentially Compact?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter math8
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Compact
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The interval [a,b] is proven to be sequentially compact through two cases. In the first case, if the range of the sequence (xn) is finite, a term c is repeated infinitely, allowing the subsequence to converge to c. In the second case, when the range is infinite, the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem is applied, which asserts that every infinite bounded subset of R has a limit point. The discussion emphasizes the necessity of subdividing the interval into closed intervals, ensuring that one contains infinitely many terms, ultimately leading to the formation of a Cauchy sequence.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of sequential compactness in topology
  • Familiarity with the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem
  • Knowledge of Cauchy sequences
  • Basic concepts of closed intervals in real analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof of the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem in detail
  • Learn about Cauchy sequences and their properties
  • Explore techniques for constructing subsequences in real analysis
  • Investigate the implications of sequential compactness in metric spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying real analysis and topology, as well as educators looking to deepen their understanding of compactness and convergence in sequences.

math8
Messages
143
Reaction score
0
I'd like to show that [a,b] is sequentially compact. So I pick a sequence in [a,b] , say (xn).

case 1:range(xn) is finite
Then one term, say c is repeated infinitely often. Now we choose the subsequence that has infinitely many similar terms c. It converges to c.

case 2: range of (xn) is infinite.
I know I can prove this using the Bolzano Weierstrass theorem that says that every infinite bounded subset of R has a limit point. But in this case I'd have to prove the theorem. How?
Or I may Try and subdivide [a,b] in two parts and say that one part must contain infinitely many points of the range, and pick a term x_n1 in that part. Next I can choose x_n2 since I have infinitely many terms to choose from. And then continue to subdivide... But then I'm stuck. I am not sure what I need to do from there or how exactly I need to write this down (how the subdivision part works exactly).
Thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The subdivision part works like this. Say you divide [a,b] into two closed intervals I_1 and J_1 (for instance, I_1 = [a,c] and J_1 = [c,b]), where say I_1 contains infinitely many terms of the sequence. Then further split I_1 into I_2 and J_2 where I_2 contains infinitely many terms of the sequence. Proceed like this to get a decreasing sequence of closed intervals I_1 >= I_2 >= ... of decreasing 'length'.

Show that the sequence {x_n_i} you formed is Cauchy.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K