Cyrus said:
Eh? Sorry I don't like green screen MSDOS that went away in the 80's. I don't really know what you mean by that.
My question was: since you seem rather satisfied with the way things are now, and gave some examples of your daily use-cases too, what do you compare it with to draw conclusion of a "jet age"? So your answer is to the MS-DOS screens that went away in the 80's.
The "screens of the eighties", that is to say the paradigm that this phrase usually stands for as a metaphor, did not actually went away. It is just indiscernible on contemporary Windows and Mac desktops, as used by today's typical fresh outta school engineers. However, rest assured that the
real jet age, as it has progressed, and as it exists today, is directly reliant on the "screens of the eighties" to make any further advancements.
A (recent) example that made me personally painfully aware of the wrong direction the engineers are educated for computer use, was very simple: I was involved in a ~9 man-month effort, which, in my opinion should have been a mere 1 (one) man-month job. The software choices that were available all lacked where it counted, with glitzy graphical interfaces, but little and woefully underdocumented "screens of the eighties" stuff needed to cut the effort 10-fold; the people involved (senior undergrads, grads, MechEng/CompEng mixture) were finding the situation an expected drudgery (indeed, at least a user-friendly one!), not making much thought of the huge inefficiency of the process, never having being exposed to "screens of the eighties" thinking. So to say, the software and people were matched appropriately, the usuall vicious circle.
It was really I who was an aberration in that chain :) Certainly for the better part, rather than in the "jet age" software, the
efficient 1 man-month effort would have been spent in the "screens of the eighties", i.e. in a capable shell, text editor, and file browser, making good use of interpreter- and compiler-like tools. It would have been
creative, near zero drudgery, and thus quite
enjoyable. However, I had no "mandate" to spend time on making this happen, and anyway had little wish to wrestle with support drones of the "jet age" software, pulling out the details they left out of the manuals, and dealing with their ill-designed "screens of the eighties" features (necessarily such, having little customer demand...)
And I won't even start griping about spreedsheet :) I would just reiterate Dijkstra's famous statement with Cobol substituted for Exell...
--
Chusslove Illich (Часлав Илић)