MHB Is the perimeter numerically equal to the area in this equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that (1/2)uv equals u + v + w, where u, v, and w are defined in terms of variables m and n. The approach suggested involves substituting the values of u, v, and w into the equation and verifying that both sides are equal. It is noted that an indirect method, starting from the final equation and working backward, may be more effective for this proof. The importance of ensuring that each step is reversible is emphasized to validate the proof. The question is acknowledged as interesting, and further exploration is anticipated.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
If u = 2(m + n)/n, and v = 4m/(m - n), and

w = 2(m^2 + n^2)/(m - n)n, show that

(1/2)uv = u + v + w (that is, the perimeter is numerically equal to the area).

This question is basically a plug and chug situation.
I must multiply (1/2) by the given values of u and v on the left side. I must then replace u, v and w on the right side with their given values and add. The right side must = the left side, right?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, it looks like the simplest way to do this is NOT "directly", starting from the given values of u, v, and w and then showing the final equation, but "indirectly", starting from the final equation then working to the equations for u, v, and w. As long as every step is "reversible", that will prove what you want.
 
I will work this out when time allows. Interesting question.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top