MHB Is the perimeter numerically equal to the area in this equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
If u = 2(m + n)/n, and v = 4m/(m - n), and

w = 2(m^2 + n^2)/(m - n)n, show that

(1/2)uv = u + v + w (that is, the perimeter is numerically equal to the area).

This question is basically a plug and chug situation.
I must multiply (1/2) by the given values of u and v on the left side. I must then replace u, v and w on the right side with their given values and add. The right side must = the left side, right?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, it looks like the simplest way to do this is NOT "directly", starting from the given values of u, v, and w and then showing the final equation, but "indirectly", starting from the final equation then working to the equations for u, v, and w. As long as every step is "reversible", that will prove what you want.
 
I will work this out when time allows. Interesting question.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top