Is the Period of Centripetal Motion Proportional to the Radius?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lord_blurg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Centripetal Motion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between the period of centripetal motion and the radius of the circular path. It suggests that the square of the period is proportional to the radius, leading to confusion about the nature of this relationship. Participants clarify that proportionality implies a consistent mathematical relationship, typically expressed as A = kB. The conversation highlights that while changing the radius affects the period, this relationship is not strictly linear or quantifiable. Understanding these concepts is crucial for addressing related test questions effectively.
lord_blurg
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
How is the Period proportional to the Radius. (The Period being how long it takes for 1 full revolution of an object)

I am also assuming there is a tension force.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
it looks the square of the period is proportional to the radius, rather.

centripetalforce.jpg
 
That's what gets me stumped though =/.

The teacher says he is going to put in the test "Show that the radius is proportional to the Radius".

What does it mean to be proportional. (It means they have a relationship I guess) But what would you write down for an answer asking if something is proportional to something else.

If the radius is changed does the Period change?
 
for a variable to be proportional to another, it implies a relationship of

A = kB (or B = pA)

where A and B are the related variables, and k or p is the constant depending on how you write the equation. thus they can be related as a straight linear line.

the radius does change when the period changes, but that is more of a statement like 'the radius increases when the period is longer', note that this statement does not really have any quantifiable mathematical relationship.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top