Is the problem wrong (deals with resolving vectors into their components)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter awesome_irl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Components Vectors
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion regarding the correct components of vectors in problems 4.9a and 4.9b. It is argued that the y component in 4.9b should be cos instead of sin, while 4.9a should be sin for the y component. The standard method for resolving vectors states that the y component is V*sinθ and the x component is V*cosθ, regardless of vector orientation. A reference from another textbook supports this understanding, clarifying the confusion. The conversation highlights the common struggle with physics concepts, emphasizing that confusion is a part of the learning process.
awesome_irl
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


4.9b cites the y components to be sin degree and 4.9a is somehow cos degree for the x components (see picture)
physics.png


Homework Equations


Here's a different textbook that supports my claim (see picture)

physics1.png


The Attempt at a Solution


Shouldn't the y components for problem 4.9b be cos instead of sin based on how the angle of the vector is oriented? Isn't this vice versa for problem 4.9a (this should be sin)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When splitting a vector V, the y component is V*sinθ, and the x component is V*cosθ. It doesn't matter how the vector is oriented. The picture you posted from another textbook confirms what it shows in the first picture. If you rearrange the sin equation, you get V*sinθ=Vy (which is the y component of vector V)
 
I just realized that T1 stood for vector V
I thought that T1 somehow was identifying Vector y

I feel stupid...REALLY stupid...
 
Don't worry about it, I think physics makes everybody feel stupid. I'd like to point you to a quote by a great physicist, Richard Feynman.

http://youtu.be/lytxafTXg6c
"When you are thinking about something that you don’t understand you have a terrible, uncomfortable feeling called ‘confusion’. It’s a very difficult and unhappy business. So, most of the time you are rather unhappy, actually, with this confusion. You can’t penetrate this thing. Now, is the confusion… is it because we are all some kind of apes that are kind of stupid working against this? Trying to figure out to put the two sticks together to reach the banana and we can’t quite make it? …the idea ? And I get that feeling all the time: that I am an ape trying to put two sticks together. So I always feel stupid. Once in a while, though, everything — the sticks — go together on me and I reach the banana.”
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top