Is the Product of a Null Sequence and a Bounded Sequence Always Null?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of sequences, specifically examining whether the product of a null sequence and a bounded sequence results in a null sequence. The subject area includes concepts from real analysis and sequence convergence.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definitions of null sequences and bounded sequences, questioning the implications of these definitions on the product of the two sequences. Concerns are raised about the behavior of the bounded sequence when its bounds are negative, and whether this affects the validity of the proof presented.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes attempts to clarify the proof structure and the reasoning behind the properties of absolute values in the context of the sequences. Some participants express uncertainty about the implications of negative bounds on the bounded sequence, while others provide feedback on the clarity of the proof.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the definitions and properties of sequences, particularly in relation to the conditions under which the product of a null sequence and a bounded sequence is considered null. There is a specific focus on the implications of negative bounds and the nature of absolute values.

phospho
Messages
250
Reaction score
0
Prove that if (a_n) is a null sequence and (b_n) is a bounded sequence then the sequence (a_nb_n) is null:

from definitions if b_n is bounded then ## \exists H \in \mathbb{R} ## s.t. ## |b_n| \leq H ## if a_n is a null sequence it converges to 0 (from my book), i.e. given ## \epsilon ' > 0 ## ## \exists N \in \mathbb{R} ## s.t. n>N ## \Rightarrow |a_n| < \epsilon ' ## set ## e' = \dfrac{\epsilon}{|H|} ## then for ## n > N \Rightarrow |a_nb_n | < \epsilon ' |H| = \epsilon ## i.e. a_nb_n also converges to 0.

I'm slightly worried about this, if H is negative, then can we just multiply ## |a_n| ## and ## |b_n| ## as afaik from the axioms if ## a>0 ## ## x>y## then ## xa>ya ## and I'm not sure if H is negative or if |a_n| is negative if we can simply just multiply the two inequalities. Any help, explaining this, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
phospho said:
Prove that if (a_n) is a null sequence and (b_n) is a bounded sequence then the sequence (a_nb_n) is null:

from definitions if b_n is bounded then ## \exists H \in \mathbb{R} ## s.t. ## |b_n| \leq H ## if a_n is a null sequence it converges to 0 (from my book), i.e. given ## \epsilon ' > 0 ## ## \exists N \in \mathbb{R} ## s.t. n>N ## \Rightarrow |a_n| < \epsilon ' ## set ## e' = \dfrac{\epsilon}{|H|} ## then for ## n > N \Rightarrow |a_nb_n | < \epsilon ' |H| = \epsilon ## i.e. a_nb_n also converges to 0.

I'm slightly worried about this, if H is negative, then can we just multiply ## |a_n| ## and ## |b_n| ## as afaik from the axioms if ## a>0 ## ## x>y## then ## xa>ya ## and I'm not sure if H is negative or if |a_n| is negative if we can simply just multiply the two inequalities. Any help, explaining this, thanks.

How can ##|a_n|## be negative?
 
phospho said:
Prove that if (a_n) is a null sequence and (b_n) is a bounded sequence then the sequence (a_nb_n) is null:

from definitions if b_n is bounded then ## \exists H \in \mathbb{R} ## s.t. ## |b_n| \leq H ## if a_n is a null sequence it converges to 0 (from my book), i.e. given ## \epsilon ' > 0 ## ## \exists N \in \mathbb{R} ## s.t. n>N ## \Rightarrow |a_n| < \epsilon ' ## set ## e' = \dfrac{\epsilon}{|H|} ## then for ## n > N \Rightarrow |a_nb_n | < \epsilon ' |H| = \epsilon ## i.e. a_nb_n also converges to 0.

Since your proof is correct, I think I can get away with showing you how to write it up a bit nicer:

Since ##\{b_n\}## is bounded there is ##H \in \mathbb{R} ## such that ##|b_n|\le H## for all natural numbers ##n##. Suppose ##\epsilon > 0##. Since ##a_n\to 0## there exists ##N\in \mathbb R## such that if ##n>N## we have ##|a_n| < \frac \epsilon H##. Now if ##n>N## then we have ##|a_nb_n-0| = |a_n||b_n| < \frac \epsilon H\cdot H =\epsilon##. Hence ##a_nb_n\to 0##.
 
LCKurtz said:
How can ##|a_n|## be negative?

ok ##|a_n| < \epsilon ## this is the distance from a_n to 0 which is less than epsilon so I guess it can't be negative. But what if ## |b_n| \leq H ## and H is negative? take e.g. ## |b_n| \leq -1 ## then ## 1 \leq b_n \leq -1 ##
 
phospho said:
take e.g. ## |b_n| \leq -1 ## then ## 1 \leq b_n \leq -1 ##

Doesn't ##1\le -1## bother you? Or ##|b_n|\le -1##?
 
LCKurtz said:
Doesn't ##1\le -1## bother you? Or ##|b_n|\le -1##?

ha - yeah, thanks.

Also thanks for writing up a more concise proof!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K