Is the 'Rising Sea Levels' Argument for Global Warming Valid?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The argument that rising sea levels due to melting polar ice is a significant consequence of global warming is fundamentally flawed. The discussion highlights two types of ice: free-floating ice, which does not contribute to sea level rise when melted, and non-floating ice, primarily located in Antarctica and glaciers. For the latter to impact sea levels, a drastic temperature drop would be required, which is not plausible under current global warming scenarios. Thus, the assertion that melting ice will lead to noticeable sea level rise lacks scientific support.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic thermodynamics related to ice and water displacement
  • Knowledge of polar ice types and their geographical distribution
  • Familiarity with climate change concepts and terminology
  • Awareness of historical climate data and temperature trends
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the physics of ice melting and water displacement
  • Examine the geographical distribution of polar ice and its implications
  • Study the historical data on sea level changes and their correlation with temperature variations
  • Explore climate models predicting future temperature and ice melt scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Climate scientists, environmental policy makers, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the complexities of climate change and its impact on sea levels.

thetexan
Messages
269
Reaction score
13
I'm so tiredd of hearing Obama and his global warming ilk use the 'seas will rise' because of melting polar ice argument.

There are two kinds of ice on the planet, the ice that is free floating such as much of the northern pole area, and ice that is not floating such as Antarctica and glaciers.

As we have all learned from kitchen science experiments if all the floating ice were to melt it would not cause the water level to rise one iota.

Much of the remaining non-floating ice, most of which is in areas far north and far below freezing expecially Antarctica. For that ice to melt the temperature would have to drop dozens of degrees on average.

That leaves the ice that is in latitudes where a plausible temperature drop of a few degrees (due to the supposed global warming) would be enough to melt that ice.

Would this be enough to raise the sea level noticeably?

Not bloody likely.

tex
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: deathbystereo
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
This post does not meet our rules for CC discussions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
9K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
14K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 180 ·
7
Replies
180
Views
36K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
13K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
17K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K