Is the S Matrix Unitary in One-Dimensional Scattering Problems?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the unitarity of the S matrix in one-dimensional scattering problems, specifically under the influence of a localized potential V(x). The wave-function is defined piecewise, with specific equations for regions x < -a and x > a. The relationships between outgoing and incoming waves are expressed through the matrix equations C = S11A + S12B and B = S21A + S22D. The conditions |S11|^2 + |S21|^2 = 1 and |S12|^2 + |S22|^2 = 1 confirm the unitarity of the S matrix, ensuring conservation of probability in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of one-dimensional quantum scattering theory
  • Familiarity with wave-functions and their continuity conditions
  • Knowledge of matrix mechanics in quantum physics
  • Basic grasp of complex numbers and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the S matrix in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of unitarity in quantum scattering
  • Explore the continuity conditions for wave-functions in different potentials
  • Investigate the role of complex coefficients in wave-function representation
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers focusing on scattering theory will benefit from this discussion.

jaobyccdee
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known
A general one dimensional scattering problem could be characterized by an
(arbitrary) potential V (x) which is localized by the requirement that V (x) = 0
for |x|> a. Assume that the wave-function is
ψ (x) =

Ae^(ikx) + Be^(-ikx) x < -a
Ce^(ikx) + De^(-ikx) x > a
Relating the \outgoing" waves to the \incoming" waves by the matrix equation

C=S11A+ S12B
B=S21A+ S22D


show that
|S11|^2 + |S21|^2 = 1
|S12|^2 + |S22|^2 = 1
S11S12* + S21S22* = 0
Use this to show that the S matrix is unitary.

Homework Equations


I don't understand why C=S11A+S12B or B=S21A+S22D



The Attempt at a Solution


I calculate the flux for the incoming beam and the outgoing beam and set them equal, i get 2A^2 ik-2ikB^2=2C^2ik-2D^2ik i don't see how C and B can be expressed with only two other variables.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jaobyccdee said:
I don't understand why C=S11A+S12B or B=S21A+S22D

You can derive these conditions by matching both the wavefunction and its derivative at x=a (we generally require these functions to be continuous everywhere, when possible).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K