Is the space of total angular momentum complete?

  • Thread starter znbhckcs
  • Start date
  • #1
znbhckcs
14
0
Hi
It's easy to see that for addition of 2 angular momenta l1 and l2 , the space l1 m1 , l2 m2 is equivalent to the space of l1 l2 l m (where l is the total angular momentum).
Counting the total number of states is usually a convenient way to make sure you got the addition right.

But what about the addition of 3 angular momenta? consider for example, l1,l2,l3 all equal to 1.
It's easy to count the total number of states: 3X3X3=27.

Adding the momenta we can get l=0,1,2,3 and so the total number of states is 1+3+5+7=16.

So what happened to 27-16=11 missing states? There must be some quantum number to distinguish between them, right?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
dextercioby
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
13,242
1,021
You're not using the formulas properly

[tex] 1\otimes 1\otimes 1 = (2\oplus 1\oplus 0)\otimes 1 = 3\oplus 2\oplus 1 \oplus 2\oplus 1\oplus 0\oplus 1 [/tex]
 
  • #3
znbhckcs
14
0
Obviously there are various way to add the third momentum, as is shown in your notation.
But my question was, suppose we have a space defined by the quantum numbers l1,l2,l3 , m1,m2,m3 .
We now add the momenta and get a space of l1,l2,l3,L,M, with M=-L,...L .
But there are not enough states in this space!

What is quantum number that tells 2 states with the same L and M from each other?
 
  • #4
K^2
Science Advisor
2,470
29
The quantum numbers that tell you that are m1, m2, and m3. Given M, only two of these are independent.

If you are asking what m1, m2, m3 state corresponds to eigenstate with given M, it's actually a superposition of all possible states such that m1+m2+m3=M. You'd have to use Clebsch-Gordon coefficients to find the weights of the possible combinations.
 
  • #5
znbhckcs
14
0
That's very interesting. Thanks for your reply.
The only thing that bothers me now is that when considering atoms with many electrons, in the central field approximation, the states are usually defined only by l1,l2... L,S mL and mS.
Or at least, that's what I thought I knew...
So is that not a complete description of a system without another quantum number?
 

Suggested for: Is the space of total angular momentum complete?

Replies
10
Views
372
Replies
2
Views
193
Replies
61
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
357
Replies
0
Views
359
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
725
Replies
0
Views
146
  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
390
Replies
4
Views
534
Replies
1
Views
200
Top