Is the Speed of Light Absolute or Relative in Special Theory of Relativity?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter astro2cosmos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Absolute Relative Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of the speed of light in the context of the Special Theory of Relativity, specifically whether it is absolute or relative. Participants explore the implications of relativity on the speed of light and its constancy across different reference frames.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about whether the speed of light is absolute or relative, suggesting it may vary between different reference frames.
  • Another participant argues against the notion that nothing is absolute in Special Relativity, stating that certain quantities, such as spacetime interval and proper time, are indeed absolute.
  • Some participants propose that the speed of light should be viewed as a constant rather than an absolute or relative quantity, emphasizing its constancy relative to any inertial observer.
  • It is mentioned that the locally measured speed of light remains constant relative to any observer, regardless of whether they are inertial or not, in both special and general relativity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the speed of light, with some asserting it is a constant while others argue for its relative nature. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the definitions of "absolute" and "relative," as well as the implications of different reference frames on the speed of light. These aspects remain unresolved.

astro2cosmos
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
According to Special Theory of Relativity nothing is absolute in this universe, but relative to each other. as we know that Einstein told me that speed of light is max. Now I'm little bit confuse if speed of light is absolute or relative i.e it may be max. for initial reference frame but for any other frame it may/should be change from the value of 3 X 108 m/s. can anyone give me the reason for this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
astro2cosmos said:
According to Special Theory of Relativity nothing is absolute in this universe, but relative to each other.
That is not correct at all. There are many things which are absolute in SR. E.g. the spacetime interval, proper time, mass, the norm of the 4-acceleration, etc.
 
And it is probably more correct to say that the speed of light is a constant, not an "absolute" or a relative thing. Ie, it is a constant relative to any inertial observer.
 
russ_watters said:
And it is probably more correct to say that the speed of light is a constant, not an "absolute" or a relative thing. Ie, it is a constant relative to any inertial observer.

Actually the locally measured speed of light is constant relative to any observer, inertial or not, in both special and general relativity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 74 ·
3
Replies
74
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
6K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K