Is the spin linked to the third quantum number ?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the relationship between the third quantum number (m) and spin in quantum mechanics, particularly in the context of magnetism and excited particles. Participants explore whether the third quantum number influences spin and how it relates to excited states of particles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if the third quantum number affects spin, suggesting a potential link due to their association with magnetism.
  • Another participant requests clarification on the specific scenario being discussed regarding the third quantum number.
  • A different participant asserts that there is no particular linkage between the third quantum number (m) and spin when using standard quantum number labels for a bound electron.
  • The initial poster acknowledges the focus on m and expresses gratitude for the clarification.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the relationship between the third quantum number and spin, with differing views presented on whether a connection exists.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of specific scenarios or definitions regarding the third quantum number and its potential effects on spin, as well as the absence of detailed explanations about excited states.

Dinofou
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

As the title says, I was wondering if the third quantum number affects spin since they are both linked by magnetism. If not, will an excited particle have a different spin than a non-excited one ?

Thanks for your answer and sorry for the possible mistakes, I'm just a young french baguette.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dinofou said:
the third quantum number

Can you give more details, or a reference, to what particular scenario you are talking about?
 
No particular linkage, at least not if you're using the standard n,l,m,s labels for a bound electron, so that the third quantum number is m.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dinofou
Yes I was talking about m, should've been more specific sorry. Thx for your answer.
 

Similar threads

Undergrad Question about Stern-Gerlach experiment
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Undergrad Trying to understand why electrons fill orbitals the way they do
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Undergrad Why is m_j not a good quantum number in strong-field Zeeman effect?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Undergrad Can an electron in a magnetic field radiate a virtual photon?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
High School Quantum Entanglement information transmission idea to knock down....
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
Undergrad The theory on the effects of polarizers on particles wavefunctions
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Graduate Magnetic quantum number and spin
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Undergrad How is spin exchange interaction generalised to many electrons?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Undergrad Does the Wigner-Eckart theorem require good quantum numbers?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Graduate How Does Total Spin Quantum Number Affect Symmetry in a Two-Fermion System?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K