Is the Sum of Christoffel Symbols Equal to Their Negative in Tensor Calculus?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter elfmotat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Christoffel Symbol
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The equation \(\Gamma_{\mu \nu \alpha}+\Gamma_{\nu \mu \alpha}=-2\Gamma_{\alpha \mu \nu}\) is false in tensor calculus. The correct relationship derived from the definition of Christoffel symbols in terms of the metric tensor \(g_{\mu \nu}\) is \(\Gamma_{\mu \nu \alpha}+\Gamma_{\nu \mu \alpha}=\partial_\alpha g_{\mu \nu}\), which aligns with the property \(\nabla_\alpha g_{\mu \nu}=0\). The derivation of the geodesic equation through extremizing the integral \(\int g_{\mu\nu}u^{\mu}u^{\nu}d\lambda\) is valid, but the initial assumption regarding the sum of the Christoffel symbols is incorrect.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor calculus and Christoffel symbols
  • Familiarity with the metric tensor \(g_{\mu \nu}\)
  • Knowledge of the geodesic equation and its derivation
  • Basic concepts of covariant derivatives and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the geodesic equation in detail
  • Learn about the properties of covariant derivatives in Riemannian geometry
  • Explore the implications of the metric tensor on curvature and geodesics
  • Investigate the role of Christoffel symbols in general relativity
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in mathematics and physics, particularly those focusing on general relativity, differential geometry, and tensor analysis.

elfmotat
Messages
260
Reaction score
2
Is the following true?
[tex]\Gamma_{\mu \nu \alpha}+\Gamma_{\nu \mu \alpha}=-2\Gamma_{\alpha \mu \nu}[/tex]
where:
[tex]\Gamma_{\alpha \mu \nu}=g_{\alpha \sigma}\Gamma^{\sigma}_{~\mu \nu}[/tex]

I ask because, while bored in a philosophy lecture, I decided to try to derive the geodesic equation by extremizing ∫gμνuμuνdλ, where uμ = dxμ/dλ.

I was able to arrive at the following, where aμ=duμ/dλ:
[tex]2a_\alpha = (\Gamma_{\mu \nu \alpha}+\Gamma_{\nu \mu \alpha})u^\mu u^\nu[/tex]

So, am I on the right track or did I make an error somewhere?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind, they are clearly not equal. From the definition of the Christoffel symbols in terms of the metric, I found that:

[tex](\Gamma_{\mu \nu \alpha}+\Gamma_{\nu \mu \alpha})=\partial_\alpha <br /> g_{\mu \nu }[/tex]
This makes sense, because [itex]\nabla_\alpha g_{\mu \nu }=0[/itex].

Unfortunately for me though, this is clearly not equal to [itex]-2\Gamma_{\alpha \mu \nu}[/itex] given that:

[tex]-2\Gamma_{\alpha \mu \nu}=\partial_\alpha g_{\mu \nu}-\partial_\mu g_{\nu \alpha}-\partial_\nu g_{\mu \alpha }[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K