Is the sun visible if you're standing on the moon?

  • Thread starter Thread starter buzzdiamond
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moon Sun The sun
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion confirms that the sun is visible from the moon, but highlights the challenges of capturing images of it due to overexposure without proper filters. Participants noted that most lunar photographs were taken when the sun was high in the sky, resulting in long shadows, which raises questions about the sun's position. Additionally, the conversation addresses misconceptions about the apparent size of Earth in lunar photographs, emphasizing the lack of reference points for accurate size perception. Specific Apollo 17 images (AS17-134-20410 and AS17-134-20411) were referenced as examples of sun images taken from the moon.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of lunar photography techniques
  • Knowledge of the Apollo 17 mission and its significance
  • Familiarity with concepts of light exposure and camera filters
  • Basic understanding of perspective and size perception in photography
NEXT STEPS
  • Research lunar photography techniques and best practices
  • Explore the Apollo 17 mission and its contributions to space exploration
  • Learn about camera filters and their importance in astrophotography
  • Investigate the physics of light and shadow on celestial bodies
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy enthusiasts, photographers interested in astrophotography, educators teaching space science, and anyone curious about the Apollo missions and lunar exploration.

  • #31
'A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.' - Willy Wonka

:wink:
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #32
Integral said:
Do not forget that a the time of the moon landings we were at the peak of the cold war. The Soviets were watching everything we did. You can bet that every radio transmission was monitored if there had been the even the slightest hint of trickery the Soviets would have been screaming bloody murder. To me the existence of a competing power attempting the same feat is the best assurance that we did indeed go to the moon.

but what if the USSR was in on it too D:
 
  • #33
SHISHKABOB said:
but what if the USSR was in on it too D:

Funny stuff!
 
  • #34
mfb said:
1) launch a big manned rocket, get in an orbit around moon, let them chat with Earth a bit (the rocket was there, that was easy to track from earth). Develop an automatic system capable of landing several tons of mass on moon. Develop some robot to distribute various objects around the landing spot, including retroreflectors, flags, rovers and footprints. Let the system launch again (we have some hundred kg of rock from moon) and dock to the astronauts in orbit. Get everything back. Find some way to simulate moon-conditions on earth, film movies there. Find some way to keep a conspiracy involving at least 1000 humans secret.
2) Same as above just without the conspiracy, advanced robots and movies filmed on earth, simply let the astronauts enter that lander and do some tasks manually, including "walk on moon and leaving footprints".

Leonard Hofstaedter said:
All I’m saying is, if they took all the money they spent trying to make a decent Hulk movie, they could probably just make an actual Hulk.

OK, enough with the moon landing conspiracy theories, and back to discussing the actual science.
 
  • #35
hav0c said:
yes unless it is a lunar eclipse on the earth
:D

Or if you are standing on the dark side of the moon facing away from the sun.
 
  • #36
buzzdiamond said:
My educated guess is that you can see the sun if you were standing on the moon. Having said that, why isn't there any pictures of the sun taken by astronauts who've "supposedly" walked on the moon..? This seems odd to me.

I think this is a good question. After searching a bit - it seems the primary photography target is Earth.
 
  • #37
trollcast said:
There are a couple of pictures of the sun taken from the moon from the Apollo 17 on this web site

http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/catalog/70mm/magazine/?134

The picture reference numbers are AS17-134-20410 and AS17-134-20411

enosis_ said:
I think this is a good question. After searching a bit - it seems the primary photography target is Earth.


There were pictures taken of the sun, not sure if they were intentional or not as previously has been said the cameras could have been damaged by direct shots of the sun.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K