Is the Time of Matter-Radiation Equality Correctly Represented?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The time of matter-radiation equality, denoted as t_{eq}, can be expressed using the formula: $$ t_{eq} =\frac{a_{eq}^{\frac{3}{2}}}{H_{0}\sqrt{\Omega_{m}}} \int_{0}^{1} \frac{x}{\sqrt{x+1}} dx $$. The discussion highlights the distinction between the density parameters and their ratios, specifically that at matter-radiation equality, $$ \frac{\rho_{M}}{\rho_{R}} = 1 $$ does not imply $$ \frac{\Omega_{M}}{\Omega_{R}} = 1 $$, as the latter depends on the scale factor a. The correct relationship is $$ \frac{\Omega_{M}}{\Omega_{R}} = \frac{1}{1+z_{eq}} $$, clarifying the misunderstanding regarding the equality condition.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cosmological parameters such as $$\Omega_{m}$$ and $$\Omega_{r}$$
  • Familiarity with the Friedmann equations and the Hubble parameter $$H(a)$$
  • Knowledge of the scale factor and redshift in cosmology
  • Basic calculus, particularly integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Friedmann equations and their implications in cosmology
  • Learn about the role of the Hubble parameter in cosmic expansion
  • Explore the concept of redshift and its relationship with the scale factor
  • Investigate the implications of matter-radiation equality on the evolution of the universe
USEFUL FOR

Students of cosmology, astrophysicists, and researchers interested in the dynamics of the early universe and the interplay between matter and radiation.

bananabandana
Messages
112
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Show that the time of matter-radiation equality, t_{eq} can be written:
$$ t_{eq} =\frac{a_{eq}^{\frac{3}{2}}}{H_{0}\sqrt{\Omega_{m}}} \int_{0}^{1} \frac{x}{\sqrt{x+1}} dx $$

Homework Equations


$$ t = \int_{0}^{t} dt = \int_{0}^{a} \frac{1}{H(a)} \frac{da}{a} $$ [Given]
$$ H^{2}(a) \approx H^{2}_{0} \bigg( \frac{\Omega_{m}}{a^{3}} + \frac{\Omega_{r}}{a^{4}}\bigg)$$

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I won't write it out here - it's just a lot of algebra - but substitute the definition of ##H(a)## into the equation for the time and rearrange is clearly what you need to do.

I got stuck however, because apparently you are meant to say: [this is in the solution set provided by my lecturer]
$$ \bigg( \frac{\Omega_{m}}{\Omega_{r}} \bigg) = \frac{1}{1+z_{eq}} = a_{eq}$$
This makes no sense to me at all! At matter-radiation equality, we could expect, by definition:
$$ \frac{\Omega_{m}}{\Omega_{r}}=1 \implies z_{eq} = 0$$
i.e matter-radiation equilibrium is occurring right now, which is obviously nonsense. [and would conflict completely with the result we are trying to show]

Have I misunderstood something?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Problem solved!

The point is that at matter radiation equality, we must have that:

$$ \frac{\rho_{M}}{\rho_{R}} = 1 $$

This does NOT mean that:

$$ \frac{\Omega_{M}}{\Omega_{R}} = 1 $$ Since :

$$ \frac{\rho_{M}}{\rho_{R}} = \frac{\frac{\Omega_{M}}{a^{3}}}{\frac{\Omega_{R}}{a^{4}}} = \frac{1}{a}\frac{\Omega_{M}}{\Omega_{R}} $$

So at radiation matter equality, we have:

$$ \frac{1}{a_{eq}}\frac{\Omega_{M}}{\Omega_{R}} = 1 \implies \frac{\Omega_{M}}{\Omega_{R}} = \frac{1}{1+z_{eq}} $$ as req'd.
 
Opps, I posted an incorrect statement and don't know how to delete this post... sorry.

Correction:
I don't think the 3rd equation is correct? is it?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
3K