Is the Time Reversal Transformation Canonical?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The time reversal transformation defined by Q = q, P = −p, and T = −t is canonical in that it preserves the form of Hamilton's equations of motion. However, it fails to satisfy the invariance of the fundamental Poisson bracket relations, indicating a discrepancy between the two criteria for canonical transformations. The calculations confirm that the transformation leads to canonically conjugate variables (Q, P) from (q, p), but the Poisson bracket evaluates to -1 instead of the expected 1, confirming it is not a canonical transformation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hamiltonian mechanics and canonical transformations
  • Familiarity with Poisson bracket relations
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives and their application in physics
  • Proficiency in mathematical notation, including the use of TeX for clarity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Hamiltonian mechanics in detail, focusing on canonical transformations
  • Learn about Poisson brackets and their significance in classical mechanics
  • Explore the implications of time reversal symmetry in physical systems
  • Investigate generating functions in Hamiltonian mechanics and their role in transformations
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on classical mechanics, Hamiltonian dynamics, and symmetries in physical systems.

neelakash
Messages
491
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Show that the time reversal transformation given by Q = q, P = − p and T = − t, is canonical, in the sense that the form of the Hamiltonian equations of motion is preserved. However, it does not satisfy the invariance of the fundamental Poisson Bracket relations. This is an example when the two criteria are not equal.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



This I have done...I just ask you to check if the procedure is correct.( ' denotes d/dt )

Q'=(dQ/dT)=(dQ/dt)(dt/dT)= -(dQ/dt)= -[(∂Q/∂q)q' + (∂Q/∂p)p' + (∂Q/∂t)]= -[q']= -(∂H/∂p)

Also, (∂K/∂P)=(∂H/∂p)(∂p/∂P)= -(∂H/∂p)...[we write (∂K/∂P)=(∂H/∂p) as Kamiltonian K is a

function of Q,P,T and Hamiltonian H is a function of q,p,t]

Thus, Q'= (∂K/∂P)...1st of Hamilton's canonical equations is proved.

Similarly, P'= (dP/dT)= -(dP/dt)= -[(∂P/∂q)q' + (∂P/∂p)p' + (∂P/∂t)]= p'= -(∂H/∂q)

Then, (∂K/∂Q)=(∂H/∂q)(∂q/∂Q)=(∂H/∂q)

Thus, P'= -(∂K/∂Q)

This shows that the given transformation leads (q,p) to canonically conjugate variables(Q,P)

Evaluating the Poisson brackets it is easy to show that they do not satisfy fundamental Poisson bracket.

Can anyone suggest why there is a mismatch between the two aspects?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are people not interested for I have not used TeX?

My attempt:

[tex]\dot {Q}= (dQ/dT) = (dQ/dt)(dt/dT) = -(dQ/dt) = -[(\partial Q / \partial q) \dot {q} + (\partial Q / \partial p) \dot {p} + (\partial Q / \partial t)] = -\dot {q} = -(\partial H / \partial p)[/tex]


[tex](\partial K / \partial P)=(\partial H / \partial p)(\partial\ p / \partial P)= - (\partial H / \partial p)[/tex]

Thus, [tex]\dot {Q}= (dQ/dT) = (\partial K / \partial P)[/tex]

Similarly,

[tex]\dot {P}= (dP/dT) = (dP/dt)(dt/dT) = -(dP/dt) = -[(\partial P / \partial q) \dot {q} + (\partial P / \partial p) \dot {p} + (\partial P / \partial t)] = \dot {p} = -(\partial H / \partial q)[/tex]


[tex](\partial K / \partial Q)=(\partial H / \partial q)(\partial\ q / \partial Q)= (\partial H / \partial q)[/tex]

Thus, [tex]\dot {P}= (dP/dT) = -(\partial K / \partial Q)[/tex]

The most sensitive part of this observation is ofcourse the identification that [tex]\ K = \ H[/tex] that I have

assumed.In general,however,there will be a partial time derivative of a generating function F so that the equation lokks like

[tex]\ K = \ H + (\partial F / \partial t)[/tex]

I have assumed that F has no explicit time dependence.So the later time derivative is zero and we have Hamilton's equations

satisfied...

My question is if my assumption is justified for this problem...Note that, the problem already ensures that the transformation does

not satisfy the fundamental Poisson brackets.My calculation gave the value of Poissson Bracket -1 instead of 1 (the correct

one). In that sense,it is not a canonical transformation...

I am not sure, but it looks to me, my assumption that F does not have explicit time dependence may be somehow related to the fact of fundamnental Poisson Bracket not

being satisfied...

Can anyone please take interest?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
56
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K