quantumcarl
- 767
- 0
Justinius said:This is exactly what I mean as well. If we say we are the universe we are equivocating ourselves with something that is greater than ourselves.
Each of us has his/her own subjective experiences within our lives. The prefix "Uni" signifies oneness, a certain unity throughout the universe. If each of us has our own subjective experiences, and we are the universe, then there is no more oneness within the universe, thus contradicting the notion of "uni."
When you look a little closer at fractal geometry and you begin to see how the one or the "uni" is present at every scale and in every curcumstance of the overall universe (not that any of us has seen the whole thing!).
Because all things in the universe are logically composed of and by the universe as well as governed by the universal law(s) then we begin to see that all things carry with them the very essence that makes a universe a universe. This is fairly evident in fractal geometry as well as Einstein's E=Mc™ where one finds emense energies stored at terrifically tiny scales... ie: atomic levels.
One contributor to this thread has already offered an opinion similar to my own that suggests the universe has "evolved", through its creation of biological events, a consciousness that is able to observe itself. Asking why this has happened would be like asking why we can taste, feel, hear and see. Its just the way it is.
However, its a bit spooky because, if each individual is a fractal of the entire universe, then that would suggest the universe can also see, hear, smell and taste regardless of biological evolution...however...
This poses the question:
did biological activity evolve a consciousness simultaneously with the rest of universe or did life (biological activity) mimic what already existed for the universe ie: non-biological consciousness?