Is the use of materials to confine nuclear fusion ruled out?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of using materials to confine nuclear fusion, specifically addressing the limitations of materials under extreme conditions. It highlights that while magnetic confinement is commonly discussed, the rapid vaporization of materials due to high temperatures poses significant challenges. The conversation references Project PACER, which explored the use of thermonuclear explosives in steel vessels, and mentions LPP Fusion's approach as a potential method for achieving fusion. Key issues include the cooling effect of evaporating materials on plasma and the detrimental impact of impurities on fusion reactions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear fusion principles
  • Knowledge of material science, particularly high-temperature materials
  • Familiarity with plasma physics and containment methods
  • Awareness of historical fusion projects like Project PACER
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced materials for high-temperature applications in fusion, such as carbon composites
  • Explore the principles of magnetic confinement and its limitations in fusion reactors
  • Investigate the impact of impurities on plasma stability in fusion environments
  • Study LPP Fusion's methodology and its implications for future fusion technology
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in nuclear physics, materials scientists, and engineers focused on developing advanced fusion technologies and containment methods.

Imarobot
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Usually people talk about magnetic confinement schemes or some such thing for fusion reactions presumably because the pressure and temperatures would vaporize/destroy all conceived material vessels too quickly. I would like to hear someone talk about the limits of materials in this realm. So, for example what pressures would a 3 inch diameter ball of high grade steel surrounding a 1 mm cavity withstand? how about 6 feet diameter of surrounding steel? The material close to the cavity would definitely vaporize due to temperature but that does not mean the rest of the shell will if everything is done quickly.

The thinking would be to increase the temperature and pressure of the fuel very rapidly before the material casing would be destroyed. This could be done electromagnetically maybe if steel were replaced with some other very strong material that is not a good conductor and the fuel is made to be conductive (think induction/eddy currents). Any thoughts on this subject are appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Imarobot said:
The material close to the cavity would definitely vaporize due to temperature but that does not mean the rest of the shell will if everything is done quickly.
The evaporating material cools down the plasma way too fast, and there is no way to avoid this. Every material that would help in containing the plasma also would cool it down way too much.

Pressure is no problem. Fusion plasma is often below atmospheric pressure, and the record is just twice the atmospheric pressure.
 
...and you would want the fusion to be continuous so you could harness it.
 
russ_watters said:
...and you would want the fusion to be continuous so you could harness it.
Not necessarily, many fast pulses would also work if there would be a good way to generate them.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mheslep
Thanks for the responses. I bet conduction away by materials is the problem, among others.

Vaporization of the material on the inside of the cavity would spike the pressure... I would think this would keep the temperature up but 30 million deg kelvin may be too high a bar.
 
The problem is that even a very small amount of impurities can severely damage the plasma. That's a big reason why fusion plasma's require such high vaccums.
 
To: Imarobot

What you're proposing (sort of) was studied in Project PACER, initiated at Livermore in the 1960's.

PACER called for exploding small thermonuclear explosives (H-bombs) in caves or steel vessels.

The concept has been studied sporadically in the last few decades. See Wikipedia.
 
mfb said:
Not necessarily, many fast pulses would also work if there would be a good way to generate them.

That's apparently how LPP Fusions's process works.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
15K