Is the Work Function of Graphene Equal to the Binding Energy?

Click For Summary
The work function of graphene is assumed to be 4.5 eV, but it does not equal the binding energy E_B as stated on Wikipedia; rather, it is related to it. In the context of the graph, E in E−E_F represents energy at a specific point in the Brillouin zone, which is not necessarily the Fermi level. The Fermi level is indeed located at the point E=E_F above K in the graph. Additionally, the second Brillouin zone K-point corresponds to the point labeled K in the left plot. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for analyzing the electronic properties of graphene.
schniefen
Messages
177
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
See the attached image.
Relevant Equations
The theory section on ARPES on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angle-resolved_photoemission_spectroscopy#Theory
Consider the attached screenshot. The work function of graphene is assumed to be 4.5 eV.

1. Does the work function correspond to the binding energy ##E_B## as given on Wikipedia? What is ##E## in ##E−E_F## in the graph on the right?
2. "...the Fermi level at the K-point..."; is this the point ##E=E_F## above K in the graph on the right?
3. "...the second Brillouin zone K-point..."; which point is this in the two pictures?
Screen Shot 2021-03-11 at 14.50.51.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
1. No, the work function does not correspond to the binding energy ##E_B## as given on Wikipedia. The work function is related to the binding energy, but is not equal to it. ##E## in ##E − E_F## in the graph on the right is the energy at a particular point in the Brillouin zone, which is not necessarily the Fermi level.2. Yes, this is the point ##E = E_F## above K in the graph on the right.3. The second Brillouin zone K-point is the point labeled K in the plot on the left.
 
At first, I derived that: $$\nabla \frac 1{\mu}=-\frac 1{{\mu}^3}\left((1-\beta^2)+\frac{\dot{\vec\beta}\cdot\vec R}c\right)\vec R$$ (dot means differentiation with respect to ##t'##). I assume this result is true because it gives valid result for magnetic field. To find electric field one should also derive partial derivative of ##\vec A## with respect to ##t##. I've used chain rule, substituted ##\vec A## and used derivative of product formula. $$\frac {\partial \vec A}{\partial t}=\frac...