Is the Work Function of Graphene Equal to the Binding Energy?

schniefen
Messages
177
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
See the attached image.
Relevant Equations
The theory section on ARPES on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angle-resolved_photoemission_spectroscopy#Theory
Consider the attached screenshot. The work function of graphene is assumed to be 4.5 eV.

1. Does the work function correspond to the binding energy ##E_B## as given on Wikipedia? What is ##E## in ##E−E_F## in the graph on the right?
2. "...the Fermi level at the K-point..."; is this the point ##E=E_F## above K in the graph on the right?
3. "...the second Brillouin zone K-point..."; which point is this in the two pictures?
Screen Shot 2021-03-11 at 14.50.51.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
1. No, the work function does not correspond to the binding energy ##E_B## as given on Wikipedia. The work function is related to the binding energy, but is not equal to it. ##E## in ##E − E_F## in the graph on the right is the energy at a particular point in the Brillouin zone, which is not necessarily the Fermi level.2. Yes, this is the point ##E = E_F## above K in the graph on the right.3. The second Brillouin zone K-point is the point labeled K in the plot on the left.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top