How does the density of states change with temperature?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the density of states in the context of Fermi energy and its dependence on the number of particles (N) and temperature. Participants are exploring various aspects of quantum mechanics related to particles in a harmonic oscillator potential and the implications for density of states calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to derive the density of states and relate it to Fermi energy, questioning the role of factors such as ##\omega## and the implications of the condition ##\epsilon >> \hbar \omega##. There is also exploration of the differences in energy levels for free particles versus those in a harmonic oscillator.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the relationship between energy levels and density of states, while others are questioning the assumptions made regarding degeneracy and its impact on calculations. The discussion is ongoing, with multiple interpretations being explored without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of specific values for N and ##\omega##, as well as concerns about discrepancies in calculated Fermi energy compared to known values for materials like lithium. Participants are also addressing the implications of degeneracy in their calculations.

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



20fwcc7.png


Part (a): Plot fermi energy as a function of N
Part (b): Derive the density of states and find its value
Part (c): How many atoms reside at 20% of fermi energy? Estimate diameter of cloud
Part (d): For the same atoms without spin, why is the cloud much smaller? Estimate the transition temperature.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Part (a)

The Fermi Energy is the highest energy level occupied by the atoms at T = 0.

We know that ##\epsilon_f \propto \left( \frac{N}{V}\right)^{\frac{2}{3}}## so the graph looks like:
29c1ma8.png


Part (b)

I'm not sure why there is a factor of ##\omega^3##, as the density of states seem to be independent:

g_{(k)} dk = (2S+1) \frac{1}{8} \times \frac{4\pi k^2 dk}{(\frac{\pi}{L})^3}
g_{(k)} dk = \frac{V}{\pi^2} k^2 dk

Using the substitution ##E = \frac{\hbar^2 k^2}{2m}## still doesn't produce any ##\omega## What does it mean when they say ##\epsilon >> \hbar \omega##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
unscientific said:
Using the substitution ##E = \frac{\hbar^2 k^2}{2m}## still doesn't produce any ##\omega##
That equation for the energy is valid for a free particle, not for one confined to a harmonic oscillator.

unscientific said:
What does it mean when they say ##\epsilon >> \hbar \omega##?
It means you can neglect the discreteness of the energy levels and consider them to be continuously distributed.
 
DrClaude said:
That equation for the energy is valid for a free particle, not for one confined to a harmonic oscillator.It means you can neglect the discreteness of the energy levels and consider them to be continuously distributed.

Part (b)
For one confined to a harmonic oscillator, ##E = (n+\frac{1}{2})\hbar \omega##. I've been thinking what the density of states would look like in n-space. Since ##\epsilon>>\hbar \omega##, I can simply take ##\epsilon \approx n\hbar \omega##.

Would it be something like:
g_{(n)} dn = (2S+1) \frac{1}{8} \frac{4 \pi n^2 dn}{1}
g_{(\epsilon)} d\epsilon= \frac{\pi}{\hbar^3} \frac{\epsilon^2}{\omega^3} d\epsilon

Therefore ##\alpha = \frac{\pi}{\hbar^3}##.

At T = 0 K, the occupation number up till fermi energy is 1. After fermi energy, it is 0. It is a heavyside function.

N = \sum n_{(\epsilon)} = \int g_{(\epsilon)} d\epsilon
N = \int_0^{\epsilon_F}\frac{\pi}{\hbar^3} \frac{\epsilon^2}{\omega^3} d\epsilon
\epsilon_F = \hbar \omega\left(\frac{3N}{\pi}\right)^{\frac{1}{3}}

For ##N = 10^6## and ##\omega = 2\pi \times 10^5##,
\epsilon_F = 6.52 \times 10^{-27} J = 41 \space neV

Checking online, the fermi energy of Lithium is 4.7 eV. I'm off by 10 orders of magnitude..
 
Last edited:
unscientific said:
For ##N = 10^6## and ##\omega = 2\pi \times 10^5##,
\epsilon_F = 6.52 \times 10^{-27} J = 41 \space neV

Checking online, the fermi energy of Lithium is 4.7 eV. I'm off by 10 orders of magnitude..

I guess you stumbled upon the Fermi energy for electrons in solid lithium. For a degenerate Fermi gas of atoms, that's indeed the order of magnitude. The corresponding Fermi temperature is ##T_\mathrm{F} \approx 0.5\ \mathrm{mK}##, which is why advanced cooling techniques are required!
 
DrClaude said:
I guess you stumbled upon the Fermi energy for electrons in solid lithium. For a degenerate Fermi gas of atoms, that's indeed the order of magnitude. The corresponding Fermi temperature is ##T_\mathrm{F} \approx 0.5\ \mathrm{mK}##, which is why advanced cooling techniques are required!

Thanks a lot, that does make sense. Where does the degeneracy of ##\frac{(n+1)(n+2)}{2}## come into play here? Should it go into the density of states or the partition function?
 
Any input on whether my density of states is right?

[Edit]I'm concerned about the missing degeneracy given in the question of ##\frac{(n+1)(n+2)}{2}##
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K