Is there a biological basis for helping people?

In summary: They seem to think that it's their right not to help and that it's not their responsibility. What do you think?
  • #1
Newai
32
1
A few mornings ago, I helped a young woman with her car (dead battery), which made me late for work. Which brought some negative consequences to me. Yet I would do the same thing again just to help.

With no benefit to me, but with negative consequences, I felt good for helping someone in need. How would a biologist explain this behavior?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #2
Newai said:
A few mornings ago, I helped a young woman with her car (dead battery), which made me late for work. Which brought some negative consequences to me. Yet I would do the same thing again just to help.

With no benefit to me, but with negative consequences, I felt good for helping someone in need. How would a biologist explain this behavior?

http://darwinianconservatism.blogspot.com/2009/12/evolutionary-biology-of-empathy.html
 
  • #3
Thank you.
 
  • #4
The attachment says: "The deepest and most primitive level of empathy is emotional contagion, the tendency to automatically resonate with other human beings by mimicking their facial expressions, vocal sounds, and bodily movements."

What does this imply for those that would not stop for the battery-deficient motorest? Are they lacking something in their deepest regions? Are they missing the 'signals' sent by other human beings that would resonate? Would the act of not stopping (poor syntax there :blushing:) be a biological, as in innate response or a learned action?

I guess this is the opposite of the question - is there a biological bases for being a jerk?
 
  • #5
croghan27 said:
The attachment says: "The deepest and most primitive level of empathy is emotional contagion, the tendency to automatically resonate with other human beings by mimicking their facial expressions, vocal sounds, and bodily movements."

What does this imply for those that would not stop for the battery-deficient motorest? Are they lacking something in their deepest regions? Are they missing the 'signals' sent by other human beings that would resonate? Would the act of not stopping (poor syntax there :blushing:) be a biological, as in innate response or a learned action?

I guess this is the opposite of the question - is there a biological bases for being a jerk?

Well, this is a good question, there are people in the world who are 'psychotic' and they have no emotional connection to the world. This accounts for a very small percentage of humans (something liek 1% of total population). I think that when a person drives by and sees a person in distress they don't 'feel nothing' because they didn't decide to stop. I am certain they still 'feel' towards that person they only decided to continue because what they had to do was more important to them.

The other day my Aunts care broke down in the middle of a really busy road just at the intersection, her battery had died. So she had no 4 ways or anything, she was sstanding on the side of the road crying and no one stopped to make sure she was ok or offered her some help. Everyone just drove by, and when I say everyone I mean everyone, I had to go and push her car from the middle of the road over to a gas station. It kind of pissed me off that no one would help but I can't say that no one was empathetic towards our situation.

It's important to note that these feelings are innate to humans however the reactions to the feelings are learned behaviour at a very young age. So it's is completely possible that those who do not help just do not know that they probably should help. The OP clearly grrew up in a very respectable family who valued helping others in their times of need. I guess this because he describes the good feeling he gets regardless of the negative consequences he receives for helping a person.
 
  • #6
Sorry! said:
The OP clearly grrew up in a very respectable family who valued helping others in their times of need. I guess this because he describes the good feeling he gets regardless of the negative consequences he receives for helping a person.

Eh, not really. My family has been very unhealthy for me. For example, I'm the only one here who isn't racist. So, I'm in that odd position of trying to understand good deeds. Hence my post.
 
  • #7
Newai said:
Eh, not really. My family has been very unhealthy for me. For example, I'm the only one here who isn't racist. So, I'm in that odd position of trying to understand good deeds. Hence my post.

Well done to you, Newai - to overcome an irrational position that was apparently laid upon you through nurture. I guess that open another question in this thread of, is helping people (or not helping people) connect to racism? I have known people holding what I considered racist views against blacks, Muslims and Jews (gays as well - but is that racist?) that have been willing to help all manner of others.

I do not have immediate access to these reports - but I am sure most people have seen stories of animals coming to the aid of their peers: elephants helping elephants, dolphins helping dolphins, great apes - great apes and whales, whales. If these are not old wives tales or urban myths, they would indicate that these beasts share with us some sophisticated motivations.

I fear this does not forward us in the quest for an answer to your question - you seem to cast a negative light on the nurture explanation, what is left is nature. As you ask, a biological reason.
 
  • #8
croghan27 said:
you seem to cast a negative light on the nurture explanation, what is left is nature. As you ask, a biological reason.
I do? I only meant that good nurturing was not present in my upbringing.
 

Related to Is there a biological basis for helping people?

1. Is helping people a natural instinct or learned behavior?

This is a common question when discussing the biological basis for helping people. The answer is that it is a combination of both. While humans do have a natural instinct to help others, this behavior is also learned and influenced by cultural and social norms.

2. Can brain activity be linked to helping behavior?

Yes, studies have shown that certain areas of the brain, such as the prefrontal cortex, are activated when individuals engage in helping behavior. This suggests that there is a biological basis for helping people.

3. Are there genetic factors that influence helping behavior?

Research has shown that there is a genetic component to helping behavior. Studies on identical twins, who share the same genetic makeup, have shown a higher likelihood of both twins engaging in helping behavior compared to fraternal twins who do not share the same genetic makeup.

4. How does oxytocin play a role in helping behavior?

Oxytocin, also known as the "love hormone," has been linked to social bonding and empathy. Studies have shown that individuals with higher levels of oxytocin are more likely to engage in helping behavior. However, other factors such as upbringing and environmental influences also play a role.

5. Can helping behavior be influenced by hormones?

Yes, hormones such as oxytocin, vasopressin, and testosterone have been linked to helping behavior. For example, oxytocin has been shown to increase prosocial behaviors while testosterone has been associated with more aggressive behavior. However, the relationship between hormones and helping behavior is complex and influenced by many factors.

Similar threads

  • Biology and Medical
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
858
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
230
Views
29K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
14
Views
3K
Back
Top