I Is there a consensus about the meaning of the Christoffel symbols' indices?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Rick16
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Index Symbols
Rick16
Messages
138
Reaction score
33
TL;DR
Is there a consensus about the meaning of the Christoffel symbols' indices?
This is from Giancarlo Bernacchi's book "Tensors made easy":

1729945525038.jpeg


And this is from Daniel Fleisch's book "A Student's Guide to Vectors and Tensors":
1729945620727.jpeg

The meaning of the two lower indices is exchanged in the two explanations. Is one of them correct and the other one wrong, or is there no consensus about this?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The Christoffel symbols are given by$$\Gamma^i_{jk}=\frac 12g^{il}\left(
\partial_jg_{kl}
+\partial_jg_{lk}
-\partial_lg_{jk}
\right)$$This is symmetric in the lower indices, so it makes no difference which of those indices you define as doing what.
 
I see, thank you.
 
Differential geometry is a difficult subject that lacks "easy" pedagogical examples. However, using GNU/Linux tools, as I attempt to demonstrate in my web page, differential geometry can be easily explored so as to attain a thorough understanding of its principles. "A picture is worth a thousand words" is the old adage and it does indeed apply to differential geometry. Please feel free to visit my page and offer a comment: http://lapiet.info/mathphys/diffgeo/diffgeo1/monkey_saddle.html...
Here is a sketch of deduction of the Lagrange equations by means of the covariance argument. I believe that it is a suitable substitute for the archaic terminology that is employed in most textbooks. Assume we have ##\nu## particles with masses ##m_1,\ldots,m_\nu## and with position vectors $$\boldsymbol r_i=(x^{3(i-1)+1},x^{3(i-1)+2},x^{3(i-1)+3})\in\mathbb{R}^3,\quad i=1,\ldots,\nu.$$ Thus the position of the system is characterized by a vector...

Similar threads