Is There a Faster Way to Prove Smoothness on Manifolds?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter JonnyG
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the smoothness of functions between smooth manifolds, specifically addressing the challenge of proving that a function is smooth without relying solely on its coordinate representation. The user inquires about faster methods, referencing the inverse function theorem and the tangent bundle. The conversation highlights the complexity of demonstrating diffeomorphisms, such as showing that ##T(M \times N)## is diffeomorphic to ##T(M) \times T(N)##, and the need for a more efficient approach in proving smoothness.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of smooth manifolds and their properties
  • Familiarity with tangent bundles, specifically ##T(M)## and ##T(N)##
  • Knowledge of coordinate charts and smooth maps
  • Basic concepts of the inverse function theorem in the context of manifolds
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the inverse function theorem for smooth manifolds
  • Explore the properties and applications of tangent bundles
  • Learn about diffeomorphisms and their implications in manifold theory
  • Investigate alternative methods for proving smoothness of functions
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in differential geometry, mathematicians focusing on manifold theory, and anyone interested in advanced topics related to smooth functions and their properties.

JonnyG
Messages
233
Reaction score
45
So if ##M, N## are smooth manifolds then ##F: M \rightarrow N## is smooth if given ##p \in M##, there is a smooth chart ##(U, \phi)## containing ##p## and a smooth chart ##(V, \psi)## containing ##F(p)## such that ##\psi \circ F \circ \phi^{-1}: \phi(U \cap F^{-1}(V)) \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^n## is smooth.

If I wanted to prove that a given function was smooth, are there any faster ways other than showing that its coordinate representation is smooth? For example, I just did a question where I had to show that ##T(M \times N)## is diffeomorphic to ##T(M) \times T(N)##. I had to explicitly construct a bijection between the two manifolds then show that the coordinate representations of ##F## and ##F^{-1}## were smooth. This was a big pain. I wish there was a theorem I could have appealed to instead.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Inverse function theorem?
Sections of the tangent bundle?

It really depends on what you have seen already.
 
Thanks, micromass. I haven't learned the inverse function theorem on manifolds yet, but I suppose it's the usual inverse function theorem applied to the coordinate representation of the map I'm interested in. I am still early in my study of smooth manifolds - I'll be more patient.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
669
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K