- #1
Gary_T2018
- 28
- 2
One hypothesis (may be a mainstream interpretation now, I didn't follow this subject very closely) about why "quantum communication" isn't possible using quantum entanglement is that we as observers, the physicists who conduct such experiments are automatons, and that at which instant would he observe such and such result was predestined.
Legitimate or not, is there a name for this sort of interpretation? A funky name like "Boltzmann brain" would be nice.
Sorry if this fits better in the off-topic section.
Legitimate or not, is there a name for this sort of interpretation? A funky name like "Boltzmann brain" would be nice.
Sorry if this fits better in the off-topic section.