Is there a program that can run depletion calculations in reverse?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of using a program to perform reverse decay calculations for isotopes, specifically whether there exists software similar to ORIGEN that can estimate the historical quantities of isotopes based on current measurements. The scope includes theoretical modeling and practical applications in nuclear science.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if there is a program like ORIGEN that can run decay calculations in reverse, allowing for the estimation of past quantities of isotopes based on current measurements.
  • Another participant notes that if an isotope like U236 is at the top of a decay chain and not produced from other isotopes, the calculations could be straightforward, but they express uncertainty about various decay chains.
  • A different participant highlights that backward extrapolation is limited by the history of element production, mentioning that heavy elements did not exist at the time of the Big Bang and were formed from earlier cosmic events.
  • One participant agrees that for a single isotope undergoing decay, solving the equations backwards is relatively simple, but emphasizes the complexity when considering multiple isotopes, especially if short-lived isotopes have decayed away or if historical reactor conditions are unknown.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the challenges of reverse decay calculations, particularly regarding the complexities introduced by decay chains and historical production of isotopes. However, there is no consensus on the availability of specific software to perform these calculations.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reveals limitations in the ability to accurately backtrack isotope quantities due to missing historical data and the complexities of decay chains, which may involve isotopes that have since decayed away.

atomicpedals
Messages
202
Reaction score
7
TL;DR
Given a quantity of an isotope (e.g. U236), is there a program to calculate how much of that isotope there was n years in the past?
I was having a conversation with a coworker and this question came up: is there a program like ORIGEN (or maybe even ORIGEN) to run decay calculations in reverse?

It's a relatively easy process to start with a given quantity of an isotope (e.g. U236), run it through a program such as ORIGEN, and estimate it's decay and production of daughters in the future. Is there a program to do the reverse? Input a quantity of an isotope x today to estimate how much of that isotope there was n years in the past?

I'm quite confident that I've probably equally overthought and under-thought this question (as you can tell, this type of modeling is not something I do regularly).
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If U
atomicpedals said:
Summary:: Given a quantity of an isotope (e.g. U236), is there a program to calculate how much of that isotope there was n years in the past?

I was having a conversation with a coworker and this question came up: is there a program like ORIGEN (or maybe even ORIGEN) to run decay calculations in reverse?

It's a relatively easy process to start with a given quantity of an isotope (e.g. U236), run it through a program such as ORIGEN, and estimate it's decay and production of daughters in the future. Is there a program to do the reverse? Input a quantity of an isotope x today to estimate how much of that isotope there was n years in the past?

I'm quite confident that I've probably equally overthought and under-thought this question (as you can tell, this type of modeling is not something I do regularly).
If U236 is at the top of a decay chain and isn't produced from anything else then it's just a simple equation. Unfortunately I don't know so much about various decay chains.
 
atomicpedals said:
Input a quantity of an isotope x today to estimate how much of that isotope there was n years in the past?
The trouble is that the heavy elements didn't exist at the time of the big bang. Our solar system was formed from a dust cloud. The dust cloud included elements created and spread by earlier events such as supernovas. Therefore, backward extrapolation is only valid as far back as the most recent element production and spreading.
 
I agree with this.

If you are looking at a single isotope (say U235) that is only undergoing decay, then it is fairly simple just to solve the decay equations backwards.

However, if you are looking for detailed answers about a set of isotopes, it can be impossible. For example, there may have been short-lived isotopes present that have completely decayed away, so you've lost all information about them (as well as possible sources for other isotopes). Also, if you are looking for isotopes that were created by a source (like a reactor), you will need to know the reactor conditions in the past.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K