Is there a program that can run depletion calculations in reverse?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the possibility of using a program like ORIGEN to perform reverse decay calculations for isotopes, such as U236. While forward calculations are straightforward, estimating past quantities of an isotope is complex due to factors like decay chains and the historical production of elements. The validity of backward extrapolation is limited by the last known production events of heavy elements, which were not present at the Big Bang. For single isotopes undergoing decay, reverse calculations can be simpler, but detailed analysis involving multiple isotopes can be challenging due to the loss of information from short-lived isotopes and the need for historical reactor conditions. Overall, while reverse calculations are theoretically possible, practical limitations exist that complicate the process.
atomicpedals
Messages
202
Reaction score
7
TL;DR
Given a quantity of an isotope (e.g. U236), is there a program to calculate how much of that isotope there was n years in the past?
I was having a conversation with a coworker and this question came up: is there a program like ORIGEN (or maybe even ORIGEN) to run decay calculations in reverse?

It's a relatively easy process to start with a given quantity of an isotope (e.g. U236), run it through a program such as ORIGEN, and estimate it's decay and production of daughters in the future. Is there a program to do the reverse? Input a quantity of an isotope x today to estimate how much of that isotope there was n years in the past?

I'm quite confident that I've probably equally overthought and under-thought this question (as you can tell, this type of modeling is not something I do regularly).
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If U
atomicpedals said:
Summary:: Given a quantity of an isotope (e.g. U236), is there a program to calculate how much of that isotope there was n years in the past?

I was having a conversation with a coworker and this question came up: is there a program like ORIGEN (or maybe even ORIGEN) to run decay calculations in reverse?

It's a relatively easy process to start with a given quantity of an isotope (e.g. U236), run it through a program such as ORIGEN, and estimate it's decay and production of daughters in the future. Is there a program to do the reverse? Input a quantity of an isotope x today to estimate how much of that isotope there was n years in the past?

I'm quite confident that I've probably equally overthought and under-thought this question (as you can tell, this type of modeling is not something I do regularly).
If U236 is at the top of a decay chain and isn't produced from anything else then it's just a simple equation. Unfortunately I don't know so much about various decay chains.
 
atomicpedals said:
Input a quantity of an isotope x today to estimate how much of that isotope there was n years in the past?
The trouble is that the heavy elements didn't exist at the time of the big bang. Our solar system was formed from a dust cloud. The dust cloud included elements created and spread by earlier events such as supernovas. Therefore, backward extrapolation is only valid as far back as the most recent element production and spreading.
 
I agree with this.

If you are looking at a single isotope (say U235) that is only undergoing decay, then it is fairly simple just to solve the decay equations backwards.

However, if you are looking for detailed answers about a set of isotopes, it can be impossible. For example, there may have been short-lived isotopes present that have completely decayed away, so you've lost all information about them (as well as possible sources for other isotopes). Also, if you are looking for isotopes that were created by a source (like a reactor), you will need to know the reactor conditions in the past.
 
What type of energy is actually stored inside an atom? When an atom is split—such as in a nuclear explosion—it releases enormous energy, much of it in the form of gamma-ray electromagnetic radiation. Given this, is it correct to say that the energy stored in the atom is fundamentally electromagnetic (EM) energy? If not, how should we properly understand the nature of the energy that binds the nucleus and is released during fission?

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K