MHB Is there a relationship between pi, physics, and probability?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aetzbar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Connection
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between pi, physics, and probability, emphasizing the connection between mathematics, geometry, and physical constants. A formula is presented, suggesting that the value of pi can vary based on specific variables related to circle diameter and a constant. The conversation raises questions about the implications of this variability and its relevance to probability and statistics. Concerns are expressed regarding the clarity and coherence of the assertions made. The thread seeks a more lucid explanation of these concepts to facilitate further discussion.
aetzbar
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The natural connection between physics,math,and geometry

A – variable from 0.001mm to infinity mm ( A = diameter of circle )

B – variable from 0.0173 to zero

C – constant number 0.0000003
The nature formula is ABB = C

B of A = root of ( C : A ) Variable pi formula

Pi of A = 3.1416 + root of ( C : A )

Report
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The only thing I could distill from your post is that you are asserting the value of $\pi$ somehow varies...in what kind of space are you operating? What does this have to do with probability/statistics?

My first inclination was to simply shut down your thread as it was on another site, but I want to give you a chance to post something lucid before doing so.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top