Is there a reversed GKPW for AdS/CFT?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Demystifier
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ads/cft
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of deriving bulk correlators in the context of AdS/CFT by utilizing boundary theory, essentially questioning if there exists a reverse application of the GKPW equation. The scope includes theoretical exploration of correlators, mathematical reasoning, and implications for quantum field theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire whether it is feasible to calculate bulk correlators using boundary theory, suggesting a reverse approach to the GKPW equation.
  • One participant explains that while the same formula can be used, the calculation is limited to on-shell bulk amplitudes, contrasting with off-shell correlators available in boundary theory.
  • Another participant provides a mathematical expression relating boundary correlators to bulk amplitudes, emphasizing the role of boundary to bulk propagators.
  • Several papers are referenced that discuss obtaining bulk observables from boundary correlators, indicating ongoing research in this area.
  • A participant seeks clarification on how to compute boundary to bulk propagators solely from the boundary theory, highlighting a specific interest in the computation process.
  • Another participant describes the boundary to bulk propagator for a scalar field in AdS, providing a specific formula and discussing the relationship between mass and operator dimension.
  • A question is raised about the applicability of the propagator to interacting fields in AdS, suggesting a complexity in the calculations that may not be addressed in the provided references.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying degrees of understanding and approaches to the problem, with no consensus reached on the feasibility or methodology for calculating bulk correlators from boundary theory. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the treatment of interacting fields.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific definitions of propagators and the unresolved nature of calculations involving interacting fields in AdS.

Demystifier
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
14,716
Reaction score
7,310
In Ads/CFT, the famous GKPW equation gives a recipe how to calculate correlators in the boundary theory by using the bulk theory. But is there a reverse? What if I want to calculate the correlators in the bulk theory by using the boundary theory?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You use the same formula. However, unlike in a QFT generating functional, where we can describe general correlation functions of off-shell objects, here we can only calculate on-shell bulk amplitudes. On the boundary, we have correlators of off-shell operators, but the sources for the bulk fields are the on-shell boundary values of the fields. Explicitly, we can say something like for an ##n##-point function in the bulk

$$ \int d\mathbf{x}'_1 dr_1 \cdots d\mathbf{x}_n dr_n A_{1\cdots n}(\mathbf{x}'_1,r_1;\ldots \mathbf{x}'_n,r_n) K(\mathbf{x}'_1,r_1; \mathbf{x}_1) \cdots K(\mathbf{x}'_n,r_n; \mathbf{x}_n) =\langle \mathcal{O}_1(\mathbf{x}_1) \cdots \mathcal{O}_n(\mathbf{x}_n)\rangle,$$

where ##\mathbf{x}_I## are the boundary coordinates, ##r_I## is the radial variable and ##K(\mathbf{x}'_I,r_I; \mathbf{x}_I) ## are the boundary to bulk propagators. It is not expected that one can manipulate these expressions to obtain the bare ##A_{1\cdots n}##, but the amplitudes for all combinations of physical states are in principle determined from the boundary correlators.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
Fzero, thank you for your illuminating answer, in view of which I can reduce my question to the following one:
fzero said:
##K(\mathbf{x}'_I,r_I; \mathbf{x}_I) ## are the boundary to bulk propagators.
How do I compute them? I mean, can I compute them by using only the boundary theory?
 
Demystifier said:
How do I compute them? I mean, can I compute them by using only the boundary theory?

As usual the propagator is obtained as the Green function for the appropriate equation of motion for the field in AdS. For example, with the upper-half space metric, the bulk-boundary function for AdS##_{d+1}## for a scalar field of mass ##m## is

$$ K_\Delta(\mathbf{x}',z;\mathbf{x}) = \frac{z^\Delta}{(z^2+|\mathbf{x}'-\mathbf{x}|^2)^\Delta},$$

where

$$ \Delta = \frac{1}{2} ( d + \sqrt{d^2+4m^2 })$$

is also the dimension of the dual operator in the boundary CFT.
 
fzero said:
As usual the propagator is obtained as the Green function for the appropriate equation of motion for the field in AdS.
By the field, you mean the free field, right? But what about the interacting fields in AdS?

EDIT: This problem seems to be solved perturbatively in the first paper linked by atty.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
676
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K