Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the possibility of deriving bulk correlators in the context of AdS/CFT by utilizing boundary theory, essentially questioning if there exists a reverse application of the GKPW equation. The scope includes theoretical exploration of correlators, mathematical reasoning, and implications for quantum field theory.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
- Mathematical reasoning
Main Points Raised
- Some participants inquire whether it is feasible to calculate bulk correlators using boundary theory, suggesting a reverse approach to the GKPW equation.
- One participant explains that while the same formula can be used, the calculation is limited to on-shell bulk amplitudes, contrasting with off-shell correlators available in boundary theory.
- Another participant provides a mathematical expression relating boundary correlators to bulk amplitudes, emphasizing the role of boundary to bulk propagators.
- Several papers are referenced that discuss obtaining bulk observables from boundary correlators, indicating ongoing research in this area.
- A participant seeks clarification on how to compute boundary to bulk propagators solely from the boundary theory, highlighting a specific interest in the computation process.
- Another participant describes the boundary to bulk propagator for a scalar field in AdS, providing a specific formula and discussing the relationship between mass and operator dimension.
- A question is raised about the applicability of the propagator to interacting fields in AdS, suggesting a complexity in the calculations that may not be addressed in the provided references.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express varying degrees of understanding and approaches to the problem, with no consensus reached on the feasibility or methodology for calculating bulk correlators from boundary theory. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the treatment of interacting fields.
Contextual Notes
Limitations include the dependence on specific definitions of propagators and the unresolved nature of calculations involving interacting fields in AdS.