Is There a Shortcut for Writing Limits in Math?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ZeroPivot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limits Writing
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges of repeatedly writing limit notation in mathematical evaluations, particularly in exam settings. Participants explore potential shortcuts or notational alternatives to alleviate the burden of continuous notation while maintaining clarity and correctness in their work.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests developing a private notation, such as underlining, for personal notes to avoid repetitive writing of limit notation.
  • Another participant emphasizes that on exams, it is generally expected to write \displaystyle \lim_{x\to a} on every line unless the expression is not a limit.
  • Concerns are raised about the importance of writing limit notation correctly, as many students may not fully understand its meaning.
  • One participant argues that a significant part of evaluating limits involves manipulating expressions, which necessitates including the limit notation during preliminary steps.
  • Another participant humorously remarks that if writing the limit notation is the hardest part, it suggests a level of brilliance paired with laziness.
  • A later reply proposes that if multiple functions are equal everywhere, one could simplify the notation in certain steps, but this approach is contingent on the equality holding true.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity and practicality of writing limit notation repeatedly. While some suggest alternatives, others maintain that traditional notation is essential for clarity and correctness, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the potential for confusion regarding limit notation and its implications for grading, as well as the varying expectations from instructors regarding notation in exams.

ZeroPivot
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
so solving lim's can be tedious not because they are hard but because you have to continously keep writing lim x->a while solving the equation is there a mathematical shortcut to writing limits without keep writing lim x->a all the time after each development?

thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can develop your own private notation for your private notes ... for example just draw an underline, and make a note as to what it means.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
UltrafastPED said:
You can develop your own private notation for your private notes ... for example just draw an underline, and make a note as to what it means.

i know, but i meant for the exam will => do the trick?
 
On an exam you are likely to be expected to write [itex]\displaystyle \lim_{x\to a}[/itex] on every single line, unless you are actually writing something down which is not a limit. Your instructor's opinion may vary (you should ask them if you feel it's really important), but I find it unlikely. There are two reasons for this

1.) Writing six characters four or five times doesn't take that much time.
2.) A LOT of students don't understand what limit notation actually means, so instructors absolutely need to grade on correctness here.
3.) You should never write down things which are not mathematically true on an exam, and this is no exception.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
A significant amount of the work in evaluating a limit is manipulating the expression so that you can actually take the limit. For these preliminary steps, since you haven't taken the limit yet, it's important that you include the "lim x -> a" part.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Quite frankly, if the hard part is writing the "[itex]\lim_{x\to a}[/itex]" you must be brilliant- and painfully lazy!
 
If your algebra goes [itex]\lim_{x\to a}f(x)=\lim_{x\to a}g(x)=\lim_{x\to a}h(x)=\lim_{x\to a}k(x)=L[/itex], and if the above equality holds because [itex]f=g=h=k[/itex] everywhere, then you could do your algebra in two steps:
- [itex]\forall x, \enspace f(x)=g(x)=h(x)=k(x)[/itex].
- Therefore [itex]\lim_{x\to a}f(x)=\lim_{x\to a}k(x)=M[/itex].
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
HallsofIvy said:
Quite frankly, if the hard part is writing the "[itex]\lim_{x\to a}[/itex]" you must be brilliant- and painfully lazy!

some of the lims get a bit complicated and keep writing lim x->a all the time like 10 times is a pain in the butt.
 
ZeroPivot said:
some of the lims get a bit complicated and keep writing lim x->a all the time like 10 times is a pain in the butt.

Then you can do it like economicsnerd suggests below.

economicsnerd said:
If your algebra goes [itex]\lim_{x\to a}f(x)=\lim_{x\to a}g(x)=\lim_{x\to a}h(x)=\lim_{x\to a}k(x)=L[/itex], and if the above equality holds because [itex]f=g=h=k[/itex] everywhere, then you could do your algebra in two steps:
- [itex]\forall x, \enspace f(x)=g(x)=h(x)=k(x)[/itex].
- Therefore [itex]\lim_{x\to a}f(x)=\lim_{x\to a}k(x)=M[/itex].
 
  • #10
ZeroPivot said:
some of the lims get a bit complicated and keep writing lim x->a all the time like 10 times is a pain in the butt.
Yep, that's "painfully lazy"!

I, on the other hand, am painfully lazy but NOT brilliant.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
7K