Is there an easier way to integrate this equation using a triangle?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Philosophaie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Integral
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of the expression (x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^(-3/2) with respect to y, particularly in the context of an astronomy problem. Participants explore various methods of integration, including integration by parts and trigonometric substitution, while addressing the challenges posed by the variables involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty with integration by parts for the integral (x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^(-3/2) dy, noting challenges with the variable y in the substitution.
  • Another participant points out that the original expression is not an equation and suggests using trigonometric substitution instead of integration by parts.
  • Some participants propose that if x, y, and z are independent, the integral can be simplified to a form involving (a^2 + y^2)^{3/2} with a^2 = x^2 + z^2, and suggest using y = a*sin(θ) as a substitution.
  • Others introduce the idea of using y = a*tan(t) as a potential substitution, discussing the implications of different trigonometric substitutions.
  • There is a discussion about the correct form of the integral after substitution, with participants debating the relationships between the variables and the resulting expressions.
  • Some participants challenge each other's interpretations of the triangle used for the trigonometric substitution, leading to confusion about the relationships between the sides and angles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best method for integration, with multiple competing views on the appropriate substitutions and interpretations of the triangle involved in the trigonometric approach.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved mathematical steps and assumptions regarding the independence of variables and the appropriateness of the proposed substitutions. The discussion reflects varying interpretations of trigonometric relationships in the context of the problem.

Philosophaie
Messages
456
Reaction score
0
I need to take the integral of an equation. I am trying to do Integration by Parts but I am coming up short.

I need to integrate (x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^(-3/2) dy for a Astronomy problem.
I tried:

u = x^2 + y^2 + z^2
du = 2*y dy

v=u^(-3/2)
dv = -3/2*u^(-5/2)

I can not do anything with the "y" in du.

Can you help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Philosophaie said:
I need to take the integral of an equation.
First off, what you have below is NOT an equation -- an equation has two expressions with = in between.
Philosophaie said:
I am trying to do Integration by Parts but I am coming up short.

I need to integrate (x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^(-3/2) dy for a Astronomy problem.
Like this?
$$\int (x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^{-3/2}dy$$

It would help to see the actual problem, to verify that the integral you set up is appropriate for the question. Assuming for the moment that you have the right integral, I don't think integration by parts is the way to go. I would use trig substitution instead.
Philosophaie said:
I tried:

u = x^2 + y^2 + z^2
du = 2*y dy

v=u^(-3/2)
dv = -3/2*u^(-5/2)

I can not do anything with the "y" in du.

Can you help?
 
If x, y, and z are independent variables, as they normally are, this is just [itex]\int (a^2+ y^2)^{3/2} dy[/itex] with [itex]a^2= x^2+ z^2[/itex]. The substitution [itex]y= asin(\theta)[/itex] shoud work.
 
HallsofIvy said:
If x, y, and z are independent variables, as they normally are, this is just [itex]\int (a^2+ y^2)^{3/2} dy[/itex] with [itex]a^2= x^2+ z^2[/itex]. The substitution [itex]y= asin(\theta)[/itex] shoud work.
The exponent is -3/2, per the OP.
 
Would it not be y = a*tan(t)?
1

For
img4.gif
set
img5.gif
. In this case we talk about sine-substitution.
2
For
img6.gif
set
img7.gif
. In this case we talk about tangent-substitution.
3
For
img8.gif
set
img9.gif
. In this case we talk about secant-substitution.
[tex]a = \sqrt{x^{2} + z^{2}}[/tex]

[tex]y = a*\tan{(t)}[/tex]
[tex]dy=a*(/sec{(t)})^2 dt[/tex]
[tex]t = \arctan{(\frac{x^{2} + y^{2} + z^{2}}{a})}[/tex]

[tex]\int \frac{a*(\sec(t))^2}{(a^3 (\tan{(t)}^{3})}dt[/tex]

I get lost from here.
 
Philosophaie said:
Would it not be y = a*tan(t)?
Yes, this would be the right trig substitution.

Philosophaie said:
1
For
img4.gif
set
img5.gif
. In this case we talk about sine-substitution.
2
For
img6.gif
set
img7.gif
. In this case we talk about tangent-substitution.
3
For
img8.gif
set
img9.gif
. In this case we talk about secant-substitution.
[tex]a = \sqrt{x^{2} + z^{2}}[/tex]

[tex]y = a*\tan{(t)}[/tex]
[tex]dy=a*(/sec{(t)})^2 dt[/tex]
[tex]t = \arctan{(\frac{x^{2} + y^{2} + z^{2}}{a})}[/tex]

[tex]\int \frac{a*(\sec(t))^2}{(a^3 (\tan{(t)}^{3})}dt[/tex]

I get lost from here.
The integral should be ##\int \frac{a\sec^2(t)dt}{a^3 \sec^3(t)}##

If you draw a right triangle with t as the acute angle, and the opposite side is y, adjacent side is a, the hypotenuse is ##\sqrt{y^2 + a^2}##. So ##\sec(t) = \frac{\sqrt{y^2 + a^2}}{a}##. Solve this equation for ##\sqrt{y^2 + a^2}## that is in the denominator.
 
[tex]\text{Where do you get "}(a*sec(t))^{3} \text{ in the denominator?}[/tex]
Mark44 said:
The integral should be ∫asec 2 (t)dta 3 sec 3 (t) \int \frac{a\sec^2(t)dt}{a^3 \sec^3(t)}
 
Last edited:
In the original integral, the denominator is ##(y^2 + a^2)^{3/2}##, right? Based on the trig substitution you chose, and on the right triangle I described, ##\sec(t) = \frac{\sqrt{y^2 + a^2}}{a} = \frac 1 a (y^2 + a^2)^{1/2}##, or ##(y^2 + a^2)^{1/2} = a \sec(t)##. Use this to rewrite what you started with in the denominator.
 
[tex]a*sec(t) \text{ does not equal }\sqrt{y^2 + a^2}[/tex]
[tex]a*\tan{(t)} = \sqrt{y^2 + a^2}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Philosophaie said:
[tex]a*sec(t) \text{ does not equal }\sqrt{y^2 + a^2}[/tex]
[tex]a*\tan{(t)} = \sqrt{y^2 + a^2}[/tex]
No, this is not how things are in my triangle, which I described in an earlier post.

Snapshot.jpg

In my triangle, tan(t) = y/a and ##\sec(t) = \frac{\sqrt{y^2 + a^2}} a##

Have you actually drawn this triangle? I never bothered memorizing the formulas you wrote in post #5 -- I just draw a right triangle and label the sides and hypotenuse according to whether the expression in the radical is a sum or difference. If you don't use the triangle, you're doing things the hard way, IMO.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K