Is there an equation to find roots?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Monkey Face
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Roots
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the existence of mathematical equations or methods to find square, cubic, and other roots of numbers. Participants explore various approaches, including both manual and computational techniques, while considering historical context and personal experiences.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Historical

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks if there is a mathematical equation to find square and cubic roots, expressing a desire for clarity due to their current level in mathematics.
  • Another participant requests clarification on what is meant by "find" in this context.
  • A participant suggests that logarithmic equations can be used to find roots, providing an example using the natural logarithm.
  • There is a mention of using logarithm tables or Taylor series expansions as methods for finding roots by hand, with some uncertainty about the practicality of these methods.
  • Several participants reference historical methods for finding roots, noting that these techniques were more commonly taught in the past.
  • One participant highlights the advancements in arithmetic techniques over the last two decades compared to previous centuries, particularly in relation to computational efficiency.
  • A participant states that to find the cubic root of 64, one must solve the equation x^3=64.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the methods available for finding roots, with no consensus on a single approach. Some methods are discussed as being more historical or less commonly used today, while others are presented as modern alternatives.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various methods, including logarithmic equations and Taylor series, but do not resolve the effectiveness or practicality of these methods for manual calculations. The discussion also touches on the historical context of teaching arithmetic and the evolution of techniques over time.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students learning about roots in mathematics, educators exploring historical teaching methods, and individuals curious about the evolution of arithmetic techniques.

Monkey Face
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Is there a mathematical equation to find square/cubic/etc. roots of a number?

Any help would be greatly appreciated - this is purely for my own interest. Also, I;m doing the C2 module of AS Maths so I may not understand more complex terms used in an explanation (if any are needed) - apologies in advance for my "ignorance". :)

Thanks!

~Monkey Face
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you explain very precisely what you mean by "find"?
 
I have the number 64. Other than by trial and error, or by simply knowning that the answer is 4, is there an equation that would give me that value of 4 as the cubic root?
 
I think you can get many equations that will give you the result of a cubic, square or whatever root you want. One of them is:

<br /> e^{\frac{1}{3}ln(64)}<br />

If computers didn't exist, you could get the result from a table of logarithms.
 
Is there a way to do it by hand?
 
If you have a logarithm table or if you know one by memory, yes.
Other than that, the only other way I can remember is through a Taylor series expansion. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_series
With Taylor series you can only approach the value and it involves hard work and time.
I remember a teacher once saying hand calculators do it with Taylor series. Don't know if it is true.
 
Okay, thanks, I'll look into it.
 
Just as the square root can be found by hand, there is a method that is similar for finding the cube. http://www.itl.nist.gov/div897/sqg/dads/HTML/cubeRoot.html

Today, of course, nobody seems to bother with that stuff, but in my grandfather's day, I am 75, or probably to others in the days of your grandfather's father, they really used that method, or, anyway, they taught it down on the farm.

In those days the multiplication tables went to 12x12 because of the use of the dozen with eggs, etc., and the more difficult things were exercises--I assume, for the better students.

Much of that was taught in a one room schoolhouse--so my grandfather said. And, yes! They had to walk miles through the snow to get to the school in the Winter! Something considered inconceivable today.
 
  • #10
Ironically there has been a lot more progress in the last 20years in new ways to do quick arithmatic than the last few hundred.

Before calcualtors people needed to learn arithmetic tricks to make doing sums by hand easier (Feynman's biog lists the fun he had with them) - but the need (and $$$) in making computer calculations faster mean that a lot of tricks for eg. finding roots more efficently have been developed recently. Main markets are cracking codes or for computer game graphics.
 
  • #11
As for finding the cubic root of 64, you have to solve equation x^3=64
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K