Is there an error in my coordinate system transformation and vector matching?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the transformation of Cartesian coordinates and vector matching between two orthonormal coordinate systems. The user transforms the axes to <1/√3,1/√3,1√3> and <1/√2,0,-1/√2>, finding the third axis via the cross product, resulting in the vector <-881/2158,881/1079,-881/2158>. The user seeks a vector that remains consistent across both systems, ultimately discovering that the only matching vector is <0,0,0>. The conversation highlights the importance of verifying orthonormality and understanding vector projections in coordinate transformations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Cartesian coordinate systems
  • Familiarity with vector operations, including dot products and cross products
  • Knowledge of orthonormal vectors and their properties
  • Proficiency in MATLAB for plotting and vector calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of orthonormal bases in linear algebra
  • Learn about vector projections and their applications in coordinate transformations
  • Explore MATLAB functions for vector operations and plotting
  • Investigate the geometric interpretation of rotation matrices and their effects on vectors
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for exams in linear algebra, mathematicians working with coordinate transformations, and engineers applying vector mathematics in simulations.

tub08918
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
So I am going through the exam guide for my exam tomorrow and there is a second problem that stump me. We transform the cartesian axis to <1/√3,1/√3,1√3> and <1/√2,0,-1/√2> which are orthogonal and we find the third axis by taking the cross product which gives <-881/2158,881/1079,-881/2158>

Then we have to find a vector that is the same in both coordinate systems
upload_2015-10-14_10-10-24.png

I plotted in MATLAB and the only vector I can find that matches the criteria is <0,0,0> is there anything I am missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have two orthonormal coordinate systems, then they are related by a rotation. (I did not check if your basis vectors are indeed orthonormal. You should check that third one pretty carefully. I don't think it is correct.)

A rotation has an axis. Under this rotation, that axis does not change. You need to find the axis of rotation between the two coordinate systems. However, unless you have done quite a bit of geometry, that might not be particularly helpful for you.

Instead, what you want is a vector that projects onto both sets of coordinates with the same first, second, and third values. If that vector is V=(x,y,z), then the projection on the original coordinates is easy. It's just x, y, and z, in the first, second, and third directions, respectively.

Now you need to find an x, y, and z such that the following are satisfied.
V dot <1/√3,1/√3,1√3> = x
V dot <1/√2,0,-1/√2> = y
V dot <-881/2158,881/1079,-881/2158> = z

Then, the components of the vector V in the new coordinate system will be the same as in the old.
 
Hi DEvens

vector <1/√3,1/√3,1√3> and <1/√2,0,-1/√2> have a dot product equal to zero, and the vector <-881/2158,881/1079,-881/2158> was the result of crossing a and b sso te should be all orthogonal to one another but I could be wrong. Your three formulas are very interesting but I am confused as to what to plu g in where.

So I have three rotated vectors <1/√3,1/√3,1√3> <1/√2,0,-1/√2> <-881/2158,881/1079,-881/2158>
and the original vectors
<1,0,0> <0,1,0> <0,0,1>
so do I do
<1,0,0>dot<<1/√3,1/√3,1√3>> = x that is the same in both coordinate system?
 
tub08918 said:
<-881/2158,881/1079,-881/2158>
appears to be a rational approximation to the correct answer < -1/sqrt 6, 2/sqrt6, -1/sqrt6 >
 
So I spent yesterday emulating a video on khan academy to my data:
C=[a' b' c'] where
a=[1\3.5,1/3.5,1/3.5]
b=[1/2.5,0,2/6.5]
c=[-1/6.5, 2/6.5,-1/6.5]

D=[a' b' c'] where a'=[1 0 0] b =[0 1 0] c=[0 0 1]

So I find the transformation matrix as

T=CDC-1

which just gives me an identity vector. Is v and v' the same then?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
19K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K