Studying Is This a Good Route to MSc Level Physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter FourEyedRaven
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Msc Physics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on an individual's plan to self-study theoretical physics to the MSc level, leveraging a strong background in mathematics. Key resources include Wolfgang Nolting's Theoretical Physics series for BSc level and Steven Weinberg's texts for MSc level, alongside video lectures by Leonard Susskind. The participant aims to focus on theoretical concepts while omitting experimental physics and electronics, believing that their mathematical foundation will facilitate understanding of physics. Alternatives to Susskind's lectures, such as those by Prof. V. Balakrishnan, are also suggested for core courses.

PREREQUISITES
  • Strong foundation in mathematics, including calculus and linear algebra.
  • Familiarity with theoretical physics concepts at the undergraduate level.
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics basics and methods.
  • Knowledge of general relativity and cosmology fundamentals.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Steven Weinberg's "Gravitation and Cosmology" for advanced understanding of general relativity.
  • Explore Leonard Susskind's video lectures on quantum mechanics and statistical mechanics.
  • Investigate Prof. V. Balakrishnan's lectures as an alternative resource for core physics courses.
  • Research advanced topics such as string theory and quantum field theory through Weinberg's "The Quantum Theory of Fields" series.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for self-learners, aspiring theoretical physicists, and individuals with a strong mathematical background looking to transition into physics, particularly those interested in pursuing a PhD in theoretical physics.

FourEyedRaven
Messages
72
Reaction score
46
Hi.

I have a background in mathematics and I want to learn physics up to the skill level of an MSc in Theoretical Physics (the background story is below, in case you have time to read that). I've been looking around for books and online classes and I've come up with this plan. What would you add, or correct? Do you think it provides a solid enough education in theoretical physics to apply to a PhD program?

BSc level theoretical physics books:

The Theoretical Physics series by Wolfgang Nolting. It covers the undergraduate core courses in 8 books:

(1) Classical Mechanics
(2) Analytical Mechanics
(3) Electrodynamics
(4) Special Theory of Relativity
(5) Thermodynamics
(6) Quantum Mechanics - basics
(7) Quantum Mechanics - methods & applications
(8) Statistical Physics.

MSc level theoretical physics books:

Steven Weinberg's books:

(1) Gravitation and Cosmology (general relativity)
(2) Lectures on Quantum Mechanics (preparation for quantum field theory)
(3) The Quantum Theory of Fields, vols 1, 2 and 3
(4) Cosmology

Handbooks:

In order to complement this core material whenever needed, I already have two handbooks:

(1) AIP Physics Desk Reference
(2) Fundamental Formulas of Physics, vols 1 and 2

Video Lectures:

The Leonard Susskind lectures on the theoretical minimum

The 6 core courses
(1) Classical Mechanics
(2) Quantum Mechanics
(3) Special Relativity and Electrodynamics
(4) General Relativity
(5) Cosmology
(6) Statistical Mechanics

The supplemental courses
(1) Advanced Quantum Mechanics
(2) The Higgs Boson
(3) Quantum Entanglement
(4) Relativity
(5) Particle Physics 1 - The Basic Concepts
(6) Particle Physics 2 - The Standard Model
(7) Particle Physics 3 - Supersymmetry and Grand Unification
(8) String Theory
(9) Cosmology and Black Holes

Background story and rationale for my choices: I have a BSc and MSc in Mathematics, which spares me the time needed to learn the background mathematics for physics, as well as computer modeling. (These are about 10 courses in a theoretical physics degree: Calculus 1, 2, and 3, Lineal Algebra, Numerical Analysis, Programming, Probability and Statistics, Mathematical Methods for Physics, Differential Geometry and Abstract Algebra). I will also not learn the experimental physics, nor the electronics and microprocessors, so it's about another 5 courses I won't spend time on. I deliberately chose only three teachers for the whole thing, so that I can have a more coherent view of the subject.
Before I went to learn math I wanted theoretical physics. I started the PhD program in mathematics but, for several reasons, I quickly got disenchanted and quit. The interest in theoretical physics came up again, so I decided to learn it by myself. I learned 90% of math this way, so I think I can probably do it with physics too. But this time I will not have the pressure of grades ruining most of the fun of an intellectual adventure. Even if I don't go and do a PhD in theoretical physics, or even if I don't finish this plan, it's something deeply interesting that I still want to do.

I realize this kind of question comes up a lot, but please give me your opinion.

Cheers,
FourEyedRaven
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'll not suggest anything strictly, but I can provide alternatives:

Prof. V. Balakrishnan's lectures can be an alternative to Susskind's lectures (core courses). It's upto you to decide which you choose, because both are equally recommended. Links are below:

Classical Physics: http://www.nptel.ac.in/courses/122106027/

Quantum Physics: http://www.nptel.ac.in/courses/122106034/

Non-equilibrium statistical mechanics: http://www.nptel.ac.in/courses/115106091/
 
  • Like
Likes FourEyedRaven
TL;DR: How can I begin to gain an understanding of astronomy? Hello there, and thank you in advance to anyone that might answer this. I'm sorry if this is the wrong place to post a question like this, as I am new to this website and also very nervous about making a post that others might see/reply to. I am a freshman in high school and I am interested in astronomy. I want to learn about space, but I am not quite sure where to begin. Is there anything that I can do to seriously expand my...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
467
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
636
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
560
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
713
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K