Is this a good salary for a software developer?

Click For Summary
A recent college graduate has received a job offer for an entry-level software developer position at $25 per hour, totaling about $52,000 annually. Initially planning to attend graduate school, the graduate is considering working while studying part-time, especially since the company offers tuition reimbursement. The job is located in Charlotte, North Carolina, where the salary is deemed reasonable compared to the cost of living. Discussions highlight the importance of negotiating salary and understanding benefits, including health insurance and retirement plans like 401(k) and HSAs. Many contributors emphasize the value of gaining practical experience while pursuing further education, although they caution that balancing work and school can be challenging. Ultimately, the graduate feels reassured about accepting the offer, especially after receiving positive feedback from peers.
  • #31
Few comments:

I did my MSEE while working, wasn't too bad but I generally only took one class a semester. A PhD might be a completely different matter, but I don't think any MS is too hard to get while working. I would be surprised if computational math was not reimbursable, my company would pay for anything related to engineering, computer science, or math.

Your health insurance rate is really good. From the few places I have worked it is common to pay $100-200 a month single and $200-300 a month for family insurance even with company assistance.

The deal is even better if you actually get time and a half overtime. That is a really nice perk.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
jk said:
For entry level? I seriously doubt it

It isnt. Thats the important distinction of that data set which is that it lumps in all people working who only have a BS whether they have 20yrs experience or 0.
 
  • #33
jk said:
For entry level? I seriously doubt it
I thought they used to break down pay by brand new, and 5 years, it appears they may be averaging it all together. The information is taken from actual payrolls. The site has a wealth of information for job seekers.

Pay About this section
Software Developers
Median annual wages, May 2010

Software Developers, Systems Software $94,180
Software Developers $90,530
Software Developers, Applications $87,790
Total, All Occupations $33,840

Note: All Occupations includes all occupations in the U.S. Economy.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment Statistics

The median annual wage of applications developers was $87,790 in May 2010. The median wage is the wage at which half the workers in an occupation earned more than the amount and half earned less. The lowest 10 percent earned less than $54,360, and the top 10 percent earned more than $133,110. The median annual wage of systems developers was $94,180 in May 2010. The lowest 10 percent earned less than $61,040, and the top 10 percent earned more than $143,330.

Most software developers work full time, and long hours are common. Nearly one-fourth worked more than 40 hours per week in 2010.

http://www.bls.gov/ooh/Computer-and-Information-Technology/Software-developers.htm#tab-5
 
  • #34
It really would help knowing what percentage of all software developers were entry level (is it 10%?) and what the range of pay was across different cities and state. Averaging out all these variables (exp level/location) makes it hard to compare to one number in one city/state like NC.glassdoor allows you to account for some of these variables by searching for positions in the exp level and city that seems relevant

http://www.glassdoor.com/Salaries/index.htm
 
  • #35
Well I've asked some of my friends that i went to school with what they thought about my offer. All of them were surprised and thought it was a good offer. I feel better about taking this offer after this thread and talking to my classmates.
thanks again everyone
 
  • #36
jk said:
For entry level? I seriously doubt it

I know some one you got 95,000 plus 20,00 stock and full benefits. It just depends on where you work and for what company.
 
  • #37
Punkyc7 said:
I know some one you got 95,000 plus 20,00 stock and full benefits. It just depends on where you work and for what company.

I think others have said that. I know somebody working at google making 120+ one year in the job but I know its an outlier case which would be awful to use to represent the average person or expectations.
 
  • #38
Punkyc7 said:
I know some one you got 95,000 plus 20,00 stock and full benefits. It just depends on where you work and for what company.

If this happens, it's not very common. I can see some of the financial companies in NY paying something like this for someone from a "brand name" school with the right background but it's not common
 
  • #39
I've never heard of anyone making that much money out of undergraduate from where I'm from.

In other news... does anyone know if it's a good idea to get a 401k AND an HSA? I just got my benefits paperwork and it's a little overwhelming.
 
  • #40
trickslapper said:
I've never heard of anyone making that much money out of undergraduate from where I'm from.

In other news... does anyone know if it's a good idea to get a 401k AND an HSA? I just got my benefits paperwork and it's a little overwhelming.
The salary looks good for a starting salary. Charlotte has UNC-Charlotte, so that's a possibility.

If one does not need the money now, it is good to start saving for retirement as soon as one can. These days a 401K is standard, as opposed to a pension. HSAs are OK to cover deductibles, and some health plans have high deductibles and out of pocket expenses, for which one can use the HSA. An HSA simply deducts money, pretax, and one can then use it for medical expenses. If it rolls over and accumulates, that's good, as opposed to a FSA, in which one loses funds not spent.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_savings_account
 
  • #41
Astronuc said:
The salary looks good for a starting salary. Charlotte has UNC-Charlotte, so that's a possibility.

If one does not need the money now, it is good to start saving for retirement as soon as one can. These days a 401K is standard, as opposed to a pension. HSAs are OK to cover deductibles, and some health plans have high deductibles and out of pocket expenses, for which one can use the HSA. An HSA simply deducts money, pretax, and one can then use it for medical expenses. If it rolls over and accumulates, that's good, as opposed to a FSA, in which one loses funds not spent.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_savings_account

Everything i have read about HSAs has confused me. People say to use it as a 401k but, it's a medical expenses account.

Why don't people have a 401k for their retirement and the HSA for medical expenses?
 
  • #42
trickslapper said:
Everything i have read about HSAs has confused me. People say to use it as a 401k but, it's a medical expenses account.

Why don't people have a 401k for their retirement and the HSA for medical expenses?

401k is a retirement account and HSA is for paying health expenses. They are two different things.

I would get the 401k and put the maximum allowable amount (17k/year this year) on it. It is one of the best financial decisions you can make. In addition to saving money for retirement, it also lowers your taxable income so if you make 52,000 a year and put away 17,000 into the retirement account, you only pay taxes on 35,000. In addition, a lot of companies will give you matching money into your 401k account up to some percentage. I would also looking into getting an IRA account in addition to your 401k

I would also get the HSA but make sure to estimate your medical expenses. If you're young and healthy, you usually don't need to put much into your HSA account. Just enough to cover the cost of annual checkups, glasses, prescriptions etc. Whatever money you don't spend by the end of the year is usually forfeited. Optometrists love HSA's b/c people buy extra glasses etc at the end of the year if they have money left in their accounts. Check the rules for your plan

Also, learn as much as you can about retirement plans, investments etc. The decisions you make now will have a large impact on your life down the line.
 
  • #43
Astronuc said:
The salary looks good for a starting salary. Charlotte has UNC-Charlotte, so that's a possibility.

If one does not need the money now, it is good to start saving for retirement as soon as one can.

I'd suggest that even if you do need the money now, still put a bit away for retirement. At least put enough into maximize your company's match. After all, that's free money!
 
  • #44
jk said:
If you're young and healthy, you usually don't need to put much into your HSA account. Just enough to cover the cost of annual checkups, glasses, prescriptions etc. Whatever money you don't spend by the end of the year is usually forfeited.

As astronuc mentioned, an HSA is not forfeited. If you've heard otherwise it could be that there is some confusion between a Canadian Health Spending Account (HSA) and a US Health Savings Account (HSA). The Canadian HSA has a one year rollover of funds OR a one year carryover of claims.

To be clear, the US HSA is not forfeited, and is the property of the employee. For comparison, an HRA is a Health Reimbursement Arrangement (also US), and is the property of the employer. It may or may not be rolled over, at the employer's discretion.

trickslapper said:
Why don't people have a 401k for their retirement and the HSA for medical expenses?

Some people do have a 401(k) for retirement savings and an HSA for medical expenses. If you go this route, I would use them for those purposes. Note that some people use the HSA as a savings account due to its tax advantages, but I would be surprised if you had enough money left over that this would be a good idea, and would generally advise against it anyways, for a variety of reasons.

An HSA with a high deductible plan is a great deal for a young person. However, you need to be responsible enough to put money away (in the HSA, for instance) to cover the high deductible, copays and coinsurance that would be required in a catastrophic incident. If you don't think you can do that, sign up for a more comprehensive health plan.
 
  • #45
Locrian said:
Some people do have a 401(k) for retirement savings and an HSA for medical expenses. If you go this route, I would use them for those purposes. Note that some people use the HSA as a savings account due to its tax advantages, but I would be surprised if you had enough money left over that this would be a good idea, and would generally advise against it anyways, for a variety of reasons.

An HSA with a high deductible plan is a great deal for a young person. However, you need to be responsible enough to put money away (in the HSA, for instance) to cover the high deductible, copays and coinsurance that would be required in a catastrophic incident. If you don't think you can do that, sign up for a more comprehensive health plan.

So how do the people who use the HSA as a savings account pay for their medical expenses until their deductible is reached? Out of pocket?

Isn't it a better idea to take advantage of the n% contribution that a company offers for a 401k instead of using the HSA as a "401k"?

To be honest I'm a little overwhelmed with all of this. I just received a bunch of paperwork (i have a pdf with over 300 pages that describes all the benefits) from my company and I've never had to think about this sort of stuff. Good news is i have a whole month to read up and make good decisions.
 
  • #46
Don't let salary limit you from doing what you love. but anyway 25 bucks an hour for an entry level job is too good to pass up I'd do it...
 
  • #47
trickslapper said:
So how do the people who use the HSA as a savings account pay for their medical expenses until their deductible is reached? Out of pocket?
The benefit of HSAs or FSAs is that the money is taken pre-tax, to it reduces one's taxable income, and the tax that one pays in that year. The HSA is beneficial since it accumulates, i.e., one doesn't lose it. It's better if it does not have to be used. Ideally, it would accumulate until one needs it for a serious illness, or if one were to get married and have children, which can cost a lot, and eventually when one retires in 45-50 years, although I'm not sure how HSAs carry over if one leaves a company.

Isn't it a better idea to take advantage of the n% contribution that a company offers for a 401k instead of using the HSA as a "401k"?
It is better to take advantage of any amount that the company matches.

To be honest I'm a little overwhelmed with all of this. I just received a bunch of paperwork (i have a pdf with over 300 pages that describes all the benefits) from my company and I've never had to think about this sort of stuff. Good news is i have a whole month to read up and make good decisions.
Yes - it is overwhelming, but it's part of the modern business world.
 
  • #48
trickslapper said:
Isn't it a better idea to take advantage of the n% contribution that a company offers for a 401k instead of using the HSA as a "401k"?

Absolutely.

To be honest I'm a little overwhelmed with all of this. I just received a bunch of paperwork (i have a pdf with over 300 pages that describes all the benefits) from my company and I've never had to think about this sort of stuff. Good news is i have a whole month to read up and make good decisions.

Take your time and really learn about it. This could end up being a significant portion of your compensation. There are several reasons group benefits are popular. One is that there are fundamental benefits to insuring groups (reduces anti-selection). Another is the tax advantage that the benefits receive.

Some of the benefits probably don't have much value to you. Group life, for instance, is taxed on benefits over $50k, and isn't something you likely need much of now, so you may choose not to go over 1x salary. Some of the post retirement welfare benefits probably have no value to you - what are the odds you'll be working there for the rest of your life? They're likely not pre-funded, so if you leave you'll receive no benefit from them.

Finally note that if this is a smallish business, your health plan will change radically in 2014 due to the Affordable Care Act. If it is large (>100 employees) then that act will have little impact on you (though your employer could still choose to make other changes).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K