Is This a New Expression for the Beta Function?

Click For Summary
A new expression for the Beta Function has been proposed, defined as B(x,y) = (Γ(x)/x) * (∑(k=1 to y) (Γ(x+y-k)/Γ(y-k+1)))⁻¹, applicable for non-negative integer pairs of x and y. The formula bears resemblance to the traditional Beta Function representation, B(x,y) = (x-1)!(y-1)!/(x+y-1)!. The discussion confirms that y is indeed the upper bound of the summation in the new expression. The community is invited to verify if this expression is previously known or truly novel. The exploration of this potential new formulation of the Beta Function is deemed interesting.
PhysicsRock
Messages
121
Reaction score
19
So, I've recently played around a little with the Gamma Function and eventually managed to find an expression for the Beta Function I have not yet seen. So I'm asking you guys, if you've ever seen this expression somewhere or if this is a new thing. Would be cool if it was, so here's the formula:
$$
B(x,y) = \frac{\Gamma(x)}{x} \cdot \left( \sum_{k=1}^{y} \frac{\Gamma(x+y-k)}{\Gamma(y-k+1)} \right)^{-1}
$$

Obviously, this only works for non-negative integer pairs of ##x## and ##y##. Still pretty interesting I think.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Sure you have ##y## as upper bound of the sum?

Anyway, it looks very similar to ##B(x,y)=\dfrac{(x-1)!(y-1)!}{(x+y-1)!}##
 
fresh_42 said:
Sure you have ##y## as upper bound of the sum?

Anyway, it looks very similar to ##B(x,y)=\dfrac{(x-1)!(y-1)!}{(x+y-1)!}##
Yes, ##y## is definitely the upper bound.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K