Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Physics Tutorials
Physics Guides
Physics FAQ
Math Articles
Math Tutorials
Math Guides
Math FAQ
Education Articles
Education Guides
Bio/Chem Articles
Technology Guides
Computer Science Tutorials
Forums
General Math
Calculus
Differential Equations
Topology and Analysis
Linear and Abstract Algebra
Differential Geometry
Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Trending
Featured Threads
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
General Math
Calculus
Differential Equations
Topology and Analysis
Linear and Abstract Algebra
Differential Geometry
Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Mathematics
Linear and Abstract Algebra
Is this a route to the prime number theorem?
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="arivero, post: 2919250, member: 81"] I notice that the trick to define Dirichlet Eta Function can be repeated for each prime number, let p a prime, and then [tex]\eta_p= (1 - p^{-s}) \zeta(s) - p^{-s} \zeta(s) = (1 - 2 p^s) \zeta(s)[/tex] So each prime p defines a function [tex]\eta_p[/tex] that adds a family of zeros at [itex]s= (\log 2 + 2 n i \pi) / \log p [/itex]. Particularly, for p=2 it kills the only pole of zeta in s = 1. Repeating the trick for each prime, we seem to obtain a function [tex]\eta_\infty(s)[/tex] having the same zeros that the Riemann zeta plus families of zeros of density 1/log p placed at the lines r=log(2)/log(p) Or, if we don't like to crowd the critical strip, we can use only the left part of the eta, the [tex] \eta^F_p(s)= (1 - p^{-s}) \zeta(s) [/tex], and then for [tex]\eta^F_\infty(s)[/tex] we get all the families cummulated in the r=0 line. But on other hand it can be argued that [tex]\eta^F_\infty(s)=1[/tex], as we have removed all the factors in Euler product. So there should be some relation between the n/log(p) zeros in the imaginary line and the other zeros in the Riemann function [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Post reply
Forums
Mathematics
Linear and Abstract Algebra
Is this a route to the prime number theorem?
Back
Top