Is this graph schetched right?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hyper
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of a graph related to hyperbolas and hyperboloids, specifically in the context of a solutions manual for a calculus problem. Participants are examining the graphical representation of equations involving variables x, y, and z.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the accuracy of the graph in the solutions manual, particularly regarding the expected hyperbolas in the yz- and xz-planes when setting variables to zero. They discuss the implications of the equations derived from the graph and express confusion over the graphical representation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the graph and its mathematical implications. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of the graph, but there is still uncertainty about the representation and the equations involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference a specific image from a solutions manual and discuss the characteristics of hyperbolas and hyperboloids, noting discrepancies between their expectations and the graph presented. There is mention of a "hole" around the z-axis, indicating a need for clarity on the graph's features.

hyper
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
In the sollutions manual is this picture:
http://img7.imageshack.us/my.php?image=graph.png

But how can this be right? If you put x=0 or z=0, you are supposed to get hyperbolas in the yz-and xz-plane, but they are straight lines?

I think you will get a hyperbola in the yz-plane cause you get the equation y^2-16z^2=16, this can be written like (y^2)/4^2-z^2=1. Have I overlooked anything, or is the sollutions manual wrong here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hyper said:
In the sollutions manual is this picture:
http://img7.imageshack.us/my.php?image=graph.png

But how can this be right? If you put x=0 or z=0, you are supposed to get hyperbolas in the yz-and xz-plane, but they are straight lines?

I think you will get a hyperbola in the yz-plane cause you get the equation y^2-16z^2=16, this can be written like (y^2)/4^2-z^2=1. Have I overlooked anything, or is the sollutions manual wrong here?

I'm not sure what your question is. Yes, if x= 0 you get a hyperbola in the yz-plane and similarly for y= 0. I don't know why you say "but they are straight lines". If you are saying they look like straight lines in the picture, that picture simply is large enough or detailed enough to tell. The figure is a "hyperboloid of two sheets".
 
But look in the yz-plane, we are supposed to see the hyperbola y^2/(16)-z^2=1. The means it is supposed the cross the y-axis at y=+-4, but it goes all the way to the origin?
 
I take back what I said before. That is a hyperboloid of one sheet and there is a "hole" of radius 4 around the z-axis. Where did you get that picture? It looks like it might be the graph of 16z^2- x^2- y^2= 16[/math].
 
Thank you. I got it from the sollutions manual from Thomas Calculus.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K