Is this idea of time travel consistent with relativity?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of time travel in the context of Einstein's relativity, exploring both future and past time travel scenarios, the implications of wormholes, and the intersection with quantum mechanics. Participants examine the theoretical underpinnings and potential paradoxes associated with time travel, as well as the implications for causality.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that time travel into the future is straightforward through acceleration, leading to time dilation effects without the need for wormholes.
  • Another participant challenges the claim that acceleration causes time dilation, clarifying that it is a function of velocity in special relativity.
  • There is a proposal that using a wormhole could allow for time travel to the past, but questions arise about the implications for causality and the existence of time-traveling versions of oneself in the past.
  • Some participants discuss the Novikov self-consistency principle, suggesting it may prevent paradoxes like killing one's grandfather, while others argue that such actions would still represent a violation of causality.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of quantum mechanics on time travel, with one participant noting that the lack of a unified theory of quantum gravity leaves many questions unanswered regarding time travel scenarios.
  • There is a suggestion that time travelers might experience a different historical timeline due to quantum mechanics, leading to uncertainty about the nature of past events.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility and implications of time travel, particularly regarding causality and the role of quantum mechanics. No consensus is reached on the validity of the proposed scenarios or the interpretations of causality.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of a unified theory combining general relativity and quantum mechanics, which complicates the discussion of time travel and its implications. The definitions and interpretations of causality are also contested among participants.

superpaul3000
Messages
62
Reaction score
1
This is the explanation I give people when they ask about time travel. I am only an undergrad so I just want to ask the more experienced people here if this is correct. Thanks...


Time travel in the context of Einstein's relativity: So we all know that time travel into the future is easy (well given a very fast spaceship anyway). You don't even need a wormhole. The acceleration (not the velocity) causes time dilation so you can accelerate to near the speed of light and travel 10 light years away and come back. The end result is you end up 20 years in Earth's future even though it only took seconds or minutes for you. So given a wormhole, you could keep one end on Earth and take the other end with you for that same ride. Now you have gates A and B next to each other. There is no cosmic censorship keeping this from happening since it does not violate causality. If I go through wormhole B, I find myself 20 years in the past but there is only the one gate A there and I am at the same time I started. So you can't keep going back in time to kill your grandfather or something. You can keep going through wormhole A though and traveling into the future at 20 year increments.

That is only given relativity, if we throw quantum mechanics into the mix things get messy. Anyway, let us consider an alien civilization that is highly advanced and exists a few billion years ago that have all this technology. Say they leave one wormhole at their home and take the other one on a similar ride but 2 billion light years away and back. So they end up in our time and they decide to check out Earth. If we go through their wormhole we end up 4 billion years in the past and we can go to Earth and just go through our entire history right? (Using the easy form of future time travel in increments) Well according to strict relativity yes, but in order to maintain causality the time traveling versions of ourselves would have existed in our past and we should see evidence of this in the fossil record right now. But if we consider quantum mechanics, then we (the time travelers) won’t see our history as it really happened, we will see a completely different series of events since each event is just a random outcome of some number of wave function collapses (however you define that collapse, Copenhagen or MWI). So after 4 billion years you might not even end up with an Earth with life. The only way we can see what happened in our past is to go through wormholes that were made at different times in our past. But as soon as you go through it that universe starts differentiating so you only have a small amount of time to check out your past (this depends on the event you are looking at, the age of dinosaurs is a long age but the time to assassinate Hitler is much shorter). Again none of this violates causality. Even if you travel to see your grandfather before you were born and kill him. This is because as soon as you go through the wormhole that person is not exactly the same person as your grandfather, even though he looks and sounds the same.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, can anyone verify this?
 
What? Verify what happens when you go through a wormhole? No. :p
 
superpaul3000 said:
Time travel in the context of Einstein's relativity: So we all know that time travel into the future is easy (well given a very fast spaceship anyway). You don't even need a wormhole. The acceleration (not the velocity) causes time dilation
Time dilation in special relativity is a function of velocity, not acceleration. It is true that if two observers cross paths twice at different points in spacetime, and one has moved inertially between the two meetings while the other accelerated at some point during the journey, than the one who accelerated will always have aged less.
superpaul3000 said:
So given a wormhole, you could keep one end on Earth and take the other end with you for that same ride. Now you have gates A and B next to each other. There is no cosmic censorship keeping this from happening since it does not violate causality.
Cosmic censorship deals with naked singularities, maybe you're thinking of the chronology protection conjecture?
superpaul3000 said:
If I go through wormhole B, I find myself 20 years in the past but there is only the one gate A there and I am at the same time I started. So you can't keep going back in time to kill your grandfather or something.
If your grandfather didn't have your parents until after the date wormholes were taken on the relativistic trip and brought back together with a time difference between them, then you certainly could meet your grandfather before your parents were born. Even if this type of time travel were possible, it doesn't necessarily mean you could succeed in killing him, perhaps the Novikov self-consistency principle would apply and it would be impossible to change the past. But grandfathers aside, this type of time travel is certainly the kind that would "violate causality" in the sense meant by physicists, where it is no longer true that we can assign a temporal order to events in such a way that causes always precede effects...for example, you could wait until the results of a lottery drawing were announced, then travel back one day before that and tell your younger self to buy a ticket with those numbers...even if there is no paradox created here, the cause of your younger self buying the ticket with those numbers lies in his own future, so this is a causality violation. And this form of time travel would definitely contradict the "chronology protection conjecture" (the most common idea about how chronology protection would be enforced in the case of wormholes involves virtual particles which build up in a feedback loop as you try to move the two ends close enough to allow for backwards time travel, either destroying the mouths before they can be moved close enough or causing a repulsive effect...see here and here for a discussion, and for a more detailed discussion read the last chapter of Kip Thorne's book https://www.amazon.com/dp/0393312763/?tag=pfamazon01-20).
superpaul3000 said:
That is only given relativity, if we throw quantum mechanics into the mix things get messy. Anyway, let us consider an alien civilization that is highly advanced and exists a few billion years ago that have all this technology. Say they leave one wormhole at their home and take the other one on a similar ride but 2 billion light years away and back. So they end up in our time and they decide to check out Earth. If we go through their wormhole we end up 4 billion years in the past and we can go to Earth and just go through our entire history right? (Using the easy form of future time travel in increments) Well according to strict relativity yes, but in order to maintain causality the time traveling versions of ourselves would have existed in our past and we should see evidence of this in the fossil record right now.
Again, you misunderstand what "causality" means, time travelers from Earth today going back to Earth 4 billion years ago would automatically be a causality violation, even if something like the Novikov self-consistency principle held sway and this trip did not lead to any "changes" to history.
superpaul3000 said:
But if we consider quantum mechanics, then we (the time travelers) won’t see our history as it really happened, we will see a completely different series of events since each event is just a random outcome of some number of wave function collapses (however you define that collapse, Copenhagen or MWI).
Since we don't have a theory that combines general relativity with quantum mechanics it's not at all clear what such a theory would say about the GR solutions that seem to allow backwards time travel, like spacetimes involving wormholes. Probably the most popular hypothesis is that quantum gravity will rule out these loopholes and chronology protection will hold true. But if backwards time travel is possible in quantum gravity, there's no reason to think it would necessarily lead to the possibility of changing the past, it might be that even though there are multiple possible histories as in the MWI, the Novikov principle applies to each individual history so time travel does not allow anyone to visit a different history than their own.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
553
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K