Is this Lennard Jones potential image wrong on the Wikipedia Italian page?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter eneacasucci
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lennard-jones
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the incorrect representation of the Lennard-Jones potential derivative on the Italian Wikipedia page. Participants assert that the force, represented as F(r), should be calculated using the formula F(r) = -dU(r)/dr, emphasizing that the derivative displayed is misleading. They clarify that for values below the equilibrium distance (r_eq), the negative derivative of the force must be negative, and vice versa. The consensus is that the image should accurately reflect these physical principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lennard-Jones potential
  • Knowledge of calculus, specifically derivatives
  • Familiarity with force and potential energy relationships
  • Basic grasp of physical chemistry concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the mathematical derivation of the Lennard-Jones potential
  • Study the implications of force and potential energy in molecular interactions
  • Learn about graphical representations of potential energy curves
  • Investigate common misconceptions in physical chemistry regarding force calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physical chemistry, physicists, and anyone involved in molecular modeling or studying intermolecular forces will benefit from this discussion.

eneacasucci
Messages
69
Reaction score
18
I found this image on the wikipedia italian page for the Lennard-Jones potential and I think the derivative displayed are wrong: not only in that reange (below r_eq) the negative derivative of the force should be negative and vice versa, but also the physcal meaning is that F(r) = - \frac{dU(r)}{dr} so I think that this is the derivative that should be displayed.
1755558802427.webp
 
Physics news on Phys.org
eneacasucci said:
I found this image on the wikipedia italian page for the Lennard-Jones potential and I think the derivative displayed are wrong: not only in that reange (below r_eq) the negative derivative of the force should be negative and vice versa, but also the physcal meaning is that F(r) = - \frac{dU(r)}{dr} so I think that this is the derivative that should be displayed.
View attachment 364615
I agree.

It would appear that ##- \frac {\partial F}{\partial r}## should be ##- \frac{dU} {dr} ##, which is the force, ##F(r)##.

(Since ##U(r)## is a function of ##r## only, I don’t think a partial derivative is appropriate.)

When ##F(r)>0## (for ##r<r_0##) we have repulsion.
When ##F(r)<0 ## (for ##r>r_0##) we have attraction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: eneacasucci

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
816
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K