I think i put this question before... but i can't be very sure.. let's suppose we have a Hamiltonian operator:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex] H= - \frac{d^2 }{dx^ 2}+V(x) [/tex] so its "energies" (eigenvalues)

satisfy that [tex] E(n)=-E(-n) [/tex] then here comes the question..is licit legal (at least as an approximation) to take:

[tex] Z(u)=\sum_{n=-\infty}^{n=\infty}e^{iuE(n)}\sim \iint dxdpe^{iup^2 +iuV(x)} [/tex] ??

The explanation is clear..you substitute a "discrete" sum over energies by a continous sum over all the energies..classically the energy of the system is [tex] E=p^2 +V(x) [/tex] (time independent potential) , so it would be similar to take the "sum-integral" approximation (valid at least at first order ??) i know that perhaps using functional analysis you could justify my approach, as a physicist when dealing with Statistical mechanics we use it all the time since "sums" are very hard to evaluate, except when E(n)=log(n) or E(n)=n :grumpy: :grumpy: usually the exponential is "real" but i think that for this case this wouldn't be a problem..also if we kenw Z(u) we could obtain the inverse of the potential taking:

[tex] A\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}du \frac{Z(u)e^{-iut}}{\sqrt (u) } = V^{-1}(t) [/tex] :tongue2: :tongue2:

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Is this licitthen why?(functional analysis question)

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**