Undergrad Is this Linear Accelerator Design Valid?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on a proposed design for a low-cost linear accelerator intended to produce positrons using Van de Graff generators instead of traditional radio waves. Participants clarify that the proposed design is an accelerating device rather than a source of positrons, emphasizing that it can accelerate electrons or positrons but does not generate them. Suggestions include using high-resistance resistors for intermediate voltages and questioning the necessity of magnets in the design. The feasibility of the concept hinges on the ability to create a suitable electron source for the accelerator. Overall, the design needs refinement to effectively produce positrons.
Invictos
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Good Evening Everyone,

A group of friends and I were having a mini-contest, to see who could theoretically make anti-matter using the most simplistic design in terms of cost and general complexity. The obvious choice for us was the Positron, due to low energy requirements on all fronts. One of us came across this idea, and we aren't sure if it would work or not... could somebody confirm either way?

Essentially, the idea is to use a linear accelerator, but instead of using radio waves (which would be difficult to do on a budget), using Van de Graff generators of decreasing size, in effect causing the difference potential to be the driving force. Multiple generators are there to ensure the beam goes where it should.

Another way to describe it is as a Cockcroft Walton Accelerator, but instead of using transformers and capacitors, this uses Van de Graff generators for its electrons - It's hard to describe, see attached for a better image...

Thoughts? Could this rag-tag machine produce positrons? How would you go about designing a low-cost positron maker?

Feel free to ask any questions, this was a rough description,
Yours in Science,
Invicto
 

Attachments

  • Rough Sketch.png
    Rough Sketch.png
    24.7 KB · Views: 714
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that you got a bit confused here.

None of these are positron SOURCES. What you are "designing" is an accelerating device, which will be for either electrons or positrons. These devices produce the accelerating field gradients. They don't create positrons, or electrons for that matter.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
I think that you got a bit confused here.

None of these are positron SOURCES. What you are "designing" is an accelerating device, which will be for either electrons or positrons. These devices produce the accelerating field gradients. They don't create positrons, or electrons for that matter.

Zz.
I think the goal is to produce positrons (and electrons) in the target.

A few high-resistance resistors would allow to get intermediate voltages for acceleration, and I would not expect magnets to help much here. I'm not sure if you need that at all if you get a reasonable beam from the electron source.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
95
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
10K
Replies
18
Views
17K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K