Is this matrix exponentiation method correct?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jhenrique
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The matrix exponentiation method presented in the discussion is incorrect. The user Jhenrique incorrectly applies the properties of matrix exponentiation, specifically assuming that the exponential of a sum of matrices equals the product of their exponentials, which is not valid unless the matrices commute. Additionally, the assumption that scaling a matrix by a scalar can be expressed as the exponential of the matrix raised to that scalar is also erroneous. These fundamental mistakes lead to incorrect results in the final matrix calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix exponentiation properties
  • Knowledge of matrix commutativity
  • Familiarity with LaTeX for mathematical representation
  • Basic linear algebra concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of matrix exponentiation in detail
  • Learn about conditions for matrix commutativity
  • Explore the implications of the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula
  • Practice solving matrix exponentiation problems using correct methodologies
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying linear algebra, and anyone interested in advanced matrix theory and its applications in computational mathematics.

Jhenrique
Messages
676
Reaction score
4
Is correct my step by step below?

<br /> \begin{aligned}<br /> \exp \left (\begin{bmatrix} a_{11} &amp; a_{12} \\ a_{21} &amp; a_{22} \\ \end{bmatrix} \right ) &amp;= \exp \left ( a_{11} \begin{bmatrix} 1 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 0 \\ \end{bmatrix} + a_{22} \begin{bmatrix} 0 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 1 \\ \end{bmatrix} + a_{12} \begin{bmatrix} 0 &amp; 1 \\ 0 &amp; 0 \\ \end{bmatrix} + a_{21} \begin{bmatrix} 0 &amp; 0 \\ 1 &amp; 0 \\ \end{bmatrix} \right ) \\<br /> &amp; = \exp\left ( \begin{bmatrix} 1 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 0 \\ \end{bmatrix} \right )^{a_{11}} \exp\left ( \begin{bmatrix} 0 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 1 \\ \end{bmatrix} \right )^{a_{22}} \exp\left ( \begin{bmatrix} 0 &amp; 1 \\ 0 &amp; 0 \\ \end{bmatrix} \right )^{a_{12}} \exp\left ( \begin{bmatrix} 0 &amp; 0 \\ 1 &amp; 0 \\ \end{bmatrix} \right )^{a_{21}} \\<br /> &amp;= \begin{bmatrix} 1 &amp; 1 \\ 1 &amp; 0 \end{bmatrix}^{a_{11}} \begin{bmatrix} 0 &amp; 1 \\ 1 &amp; 1 \end{bmatrix}^{a_{22}} \begin{bmatrix} 1 &amp; 1 \\ 0 &amp; 1 \end{bmatrix}^{a_{12}} \begin{bmatrix} 1 &amp; 0 \\ 1 &amp; 1 \end{bmatrix}^{a_{21}}<br /> \end{aligned}
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Jhenrique! :smile:

Hint:

i] what is exp##\begin{bmatrix} a & 0 \\ 0 & a \\ \end{bmatrix}## ? what is exp##\begin{bmatrix} 0 & a \\ a & 0 \\ \end{bmatrix}## ?

ii] do your final matrices commute? :wink:
 
Jhenrique, I fixed your LaTeX so it doesn't spill across the screen.

The answer to your question is no. You made multiple errors. Your second line erroneously assumes ##\exp(A+B) = \exp(A)\exp(B)## and also erroneously assumes ##\exp(sA)=\exp(A)^s##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K