Is this ok with Polar coordinates?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the mathematical relationship between unit vectors in polar coordinates, specifically addressing the change in the unit vector denoted as de_r. It clarifies that de_r represents the difference between two unit vectors rather than being a unit vector itself. The explanation involves analyzing the squared magnitude of the difference between two infinitesimally close unit vectors, e_1 and e_2, and applying Taylor expansion to the cosine function for small angles to derive the necessary relationships.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polar coordinates and unit vectors
  • Familiarity with vector operations and properties
  • Knowledge of Taylor series expansion
  • Basic principles of calculus, particularly limits and infinitesimals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of unit vectors in polar coordinates
  • Learn about Taylor series and its applications in vector calculus
  • Explore the geometric interpretation of vector differences
  • Investigate the relationship between angles and vector magnitudes
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying vector calculus and polar coordinates, as well as anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of vector relationships and changes in unit vectors.

Azorspace
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



we have this diagram were it says that the change in the unit vector der equals in magnitude the change in the angle between the two unit vectors er. Could someone explain me why is this?

I include the diagram named Polar coordinates.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think de_r is a unit vector. It is the difference between two unit vectors, but it itself is not a unit vector.
 
He doesn't say that de_r is a unit vector, it's the *change* in a unit vector.

But to answer the original question: yes, if you consider |e_1-e_2|^2 and use that e_1 is only a little (infinitesimally) different from e_2, e_1=e_2+\delta e, then you'll find what you need by comparing the answer to e_1\cdot e_2, and using how the angle between two vectors relates to the angle between the vectors, and Taylor expanding the cosine for small angles.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
14K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
960
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K