Is This Propositional Logic Formulation Correct for Validating the Argument?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 4K views
Rytif
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
1. Problem
Directions: Using propositional logic, prove that each argument is valid. Use the statement letters shown.

If the birds are flying south and the leaves are turning, then it must be fall. Fall brings cold weather. The leaves are turning but the weather is not cold. Therefore the birds are not flying south. B, L, F, C2. The attempt at a solution

B = birds flying south.
L = leaves are turning.
F = is fall.
C = it is cold.

[(B & L)->F] & (F->C) & (L & C')->(B')

(I'm just wondering if I have the correct logic without proving it yet)I appreciate it, thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It doesn't seem to me like you want a single statement. Moreso something like assume all of these are true:

(B & L)->F
F->C
L & C'

as three separate statements, and your objective is to prove that B' is true