quantum123
- 306
- 1
Is this really Coriolis effect?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/fast_track/9758180.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/fast_track/9758180.stm
The discussion centers on the validity of the Coriolis effect as demonstrated in a tourist attraction, asserting that the observed phenomena are misleading. Participants highlight that the Coriolis effect is negligible near the equator and requires specific conditions to be observable, such as using a large, circular pan and allowing water to settle. The Shapiro experiment of 1962 is referenced as a legitimate method to observe the effect at midlatitudes, emphasizing that the experiment shown in the video is a tourist scam. The conclusion is that the Coriolis effect cannot be accurately demonstrated in the conditions presented in the video.
PREREQUISITESStudents of physics, meteorologists, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the Coriolis effect and its real-world applications.
quantum123 said:Why?
In the case of weather patterns in the northern hemisphere, low pressure areas rotate counter-clockwise, high pressure areas clockwise. Wiki article has more info:MikeyW said:The Coriolis force in the northern hemisphere should be counter-clockwise!
edit- got confused, give us one secondrcgldr said:In the case of weather patterns in the northern hemisphere, low pressure areas rotate counter-clockwise, high pressure areas clockwise. Wiki article has more info:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_Hemisphere
It's a tourist scam. The BBC has fallen this very same scam for before in the show Pole to Pole with Michael Palin. Shame!dipole said:Seems like more of a trick to me than anything.