- #1
theo1234901
- 7
- 0
in the july 2017 edition of Physics today, there's an article on "Early Description of Coriolis Effect" which show Claude Dechales anti-copernican argument have shown the coriolis effect before Coriolis state the coriolis effect.
LINK:
http://physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/full/10.1063/PT.3.3610
My problem with this article is I can't figure it out why this arguments is wrong. Does this effect really happens in real life or are there something I'm missing?
LINK:
http://physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/full/10.1063/PT.3.3610
My problem with this article is I can't figure it out why this arguments is wrong. Does this effect really happens in real life or are there something I'm missing?