quantum123
- 306
- 1
Is this really Coriolis effect?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/fast_track/9758180.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/fast_track/9758180.stm
The discussion centers around the validity of a demonstration claiming to illustrate the Coriolis effect, particularly in the context of a video showing water draining in different directions based on geographic location. Participants explore whether the observed behavior is genuinely due to the Coriolis effect or if it is a result of other factors, such as container shape or initial water motion. The conversation touches on theoretical implications, practical demonstrations, and potential misconceptions.
Participants do not reach a consensus. There are multiple competing views regarding the legitimacy of the Coriolis effect in the demonstration, with some asserting it is a valid phenomenon while others maintain it is a trick or scam.
Participants highlight limitations in the experimental setup, including the influence of initial water motion, container shape, and the small scale of the demonstration relative to the Coriolis effect's expected impact.
quantum123 said:Why?
In the case of weather patterns in the northern hemisphere, low pressure areas rotate counter-clockwise, high pressure areas clockwise. Wiki article has more info:MikeyW said:The Coriolis force in the northern hemisphere should be counter-clockwise!
edit- got confused, give us one secondrcgldr said:In the case of weather patterns in the northern hemisphere, low pressure areas rotate counter-clockwise, high pressure areas clockwise. Wiki article has more info:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_Hemisphere
It's a tourist scam. The BBC has fallen this very same scam for before in the show Pole to Pole with Michael Palin. Shame!dipole said:Seems like more of a trick to me than anything.