Is this the correct set up for the electric field?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the electric field generated by a spherical conductor with radius ##a## carrying charge ##q##, along with a jelly of constant charge density ##\rho## extending from radius ##a## to radius ##b##. The participant correctly applies Gauss's Law, represented by the equation ##\oint \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{a}=\frac{Q_{enc}}{\epsilon_0}##, to derive the electric field in different regions. The final expressions for the electric field are provided, but the notation requires correction to ensure that the unit vector ##\hat{r}## properly multiplies the entire expression rather than just the last term.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's Law in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with spherical coordinates and vector notation
  • Knowledge of electric field concepts and charge distributions
  • Basic calculus for integration of charge density
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of electric fields using Gauss's Law
  • Study vector notation and its proper usage in physics
  • Explore charge distribution effects on electric fields
  • Learn about the implications of electric field calculations in real-world applications
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone involved in electrical engineering or physics research focusing on electrostatics and electric fields.

ghostfolk
Messages
58
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A spherical conductor of radius ##a## carries a charge q and also there is a jelly of constant charge ##rho## per unit volume extending from radius ##a## out to radius ##b##.
I'm looking to see if I got the correct set up for the electric field of this spherical conductor for all space.

Homework Equations


##\oint \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{a}=\frac{Q_{enc}}{\epsilon_0}##

The Attempt at a Solution


##\oint \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{a}=4\pi r^2##
##Q_{enc}=\int_a^r 4\pi r'^2 \rho dr'+q=\frac{4\pi}{3}(r^3-a^3)\rho+q##
So then,
##E=\begin{cases}
0, r<a& \\\
\rho \frac{(r^3-a^3)}{3r^2 \epsilon_0}+ \frac{q}{4\pi r^2\epsilon_0} \hat{r}, a<r<b\\
\rho \frac{(b^3-a^3)}{3r^2 \epsilon_0} +\frac{q}{4\pi r^2\epsilon_0} \hat{r}, b\le r
\end{cases}##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks good except for the incorrect notation. You should write
$$\vec{E}=\begin{cases}
0 & r<a \\
\left[\rho \frac{(r^3-a^3)}{3r^2 \epsilon_0}+ \frac{q}{4\pi r^2\epsilon_0}\right] \hat{r} & a<r<b \\
\left[\rho \frac{(b^3-a^3)}{3r^2 \epsilon_0} +\frac{q}{4\pi r^2\epsilon_0}\right] \hat{r} & b\le r
\end{cases}.$$ The way you wrote it, ##\hat{r}## only multiplies the last term, and you'd be adding a scalar to a vector, which doesn't make sense.
 
vela said:
Looks good except for the incorrect notation. You should write
$$\vec{E}=\begin{cases}
0 & r<a \\
\left[\rho \frac{(r^3-a^3)}{3r^2 \epsilon_0}+ \frac{q}{4\pi r^2\epsilon_0}\right] \hat{r} & a<r<b \\
\left[\rho \frac{(b^3-a^3)}{3r^2 \epsilon_0} +\frac{q}{4\pi r^2\epsilon_0}\right] \hat{r} & b\le r
\end{cases}.$$ The way you wrote it, ##\hat{r}## only multiplies the last term, and you'd be adding a scalar to a vector, which doesn't make sense.
Yeah I should've added parentheses.Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K