Is This the Correct Thermodynamic Analysis of a Refrigerator Cycle?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the thermodynamic analysis of a refrigerator cycle, specifically examining the principles of entropy and work associated with the cycle. Participants are exploring the implications of the second law of thermodynamics and the first law in the context of reversible and irreversible processes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the derivation of equations related to entropy changes and the conditions for reversibility. There are attempts to relate the minimum work required to the heat transfer involved in the cycle. Questions arise regarding the assumptions made about the cycle's reversibility and the relationship between specific heat and mass.

Discussion Status

Some participants have made progress in deriving equations for entropy changes and minimum work, while others are questioning the assumptions and relationships between variables. There is an ongoing exploration of how to reconcile different expressions for minimum work without reaching a consensus on the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of specific temperature values, which limits numerical calculations. There is also discussion about the implications of assuming reversibility and the potential impact of entropy generation on work requirements.

roam
Messages
1,265
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



http://img21.imageshack.us/img21/1197/questionof.jpg

The Attempt at a Solution



For the first part, if we assume that the cycle is reversible from the 2nd law we have

[itex]\Delta S = \frac{\Delta Q}{T}+S_{gen} = 0[/itex]

And here is the Clasius Inequality

[itex]S_{gen} \geq 0 \implies \frac{\Delta Q}{T} \leq 0[/itex]

[itex]\frac{Q_x}{T_1}-\int^{T_2}_{T_1} \frac{\Delta Q}{T} \leq 0[/itex]

Since ΔQ = dT

[itex]\frac{Q_x}{T_1}-\int^{T_2}_{T_1} \frac{dT}{T} = \frac{Q_x}{T_1}- \ln \frac{T_2}{T_1} \leq 0[/itex]

[itex]T_2 \geq T_1e^{\frac{Q_x}{T_x}}[/itex]

Since we do not know the temprature values we can't make numerical calculation of the lower limit for the final temperature of y. But did I derive the correct equation?

For the second part of the equation, to find the minimum value of work that needs to be supplied to the heat pump I tried to use the 1st Law;

Q − W = U = 0 → W = mcΔT - U

How can we use this to show the above expression for Wmin?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
We do not know if the cycle is reversible or irreversible. But I assumed that it is reversible because if it is not then more and more work is required due to the entropy generated.
 
Last edited:
Okay, I figured out part (1) :smile:, but I'm still having some trouble working out the minimum work.

The entropy change of x is

[itex]\Delta S_x = \int^{T_2}_{T_1} C_p \frac{dT}{T} = C_p \ln \frac{T_2}{T_1}[/itex]

The entropy change of y is

[itex]\Delta S_y = \int^{T_2’}_{T_1} C_p \frac{dT}{T} = C_p \ln \frac{T_2’}{T_1}[/itex]

The total entropy change is

[itex]\Delta S_{tot} =\Delta S_x + \Delta S_y = C_p \ln \frac{T_2}{T_1} + C_p \ln \frac{T_2’}{T_1}[/itex]

And we know from the entropy principal that ΔS ≥ 0, so

[itex]\left( C_p \ln \frac{T_2}{T_1} + C_p \ln \frac{T_2’}{T_1} \right) \geq 0[/itex]

[itex]C_p \ln \frac{T_2T_2’}{T_1^2} \geq 0[/itex]

The minimum value of T2’ would be

[itex]C_p \ln \frac{T_2T_2’}{T_1^2} = 0 = \ln 1[/itex]

[itex]\therefore T_2’ = \frac{T_1^2}{T_2}[/itex]

Okay now the minimum work:

Heat removed from x to cool it is Q=Cp (T1-T2) and the heat added to y is Q+W=Cp (T2'-T1) so

W= Cp(T2'-T1)-Cp(T1-T2)=Cp(T'2+T2-2T1)

Substituting the minimum temprature we found we end up with

[itex]W_{min} = C_p \left( \frac{T_1^2}{T_2} +T_2-2T_1 \right) = C_p \frac{(T_1-T_2)^2}{T_2}[/itex]

But the expression I need is:

[itex]W_{min} = \frac{mc (T_1-T_2)^2}{T_2}[/itex]

What could we do to arrive at that expression? :confused:
 
Last edited:
The only way I can have:

[itex]W_{min} = C_p \frac{(T_1-T_2)^2}{T_2} = \frac{mc (T_1-T_2)^2}{T_2}[/itex]

is if Cp is equal to mc. But how could this be?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K