Is Three Particle Pion Decay Possible?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Derivator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay Particle Pion
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of a three-particle decay of the pion, specifically the decay of a negatively charged pion (\(\pi^-\)) into an up quark, an anti-up quark, a muon, and an anti-muon neutrino. Participants explore the conservation laws applicable to this decay and the energy constraints involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that the decay \(\pi^- \rightarrow u \bar{u} + \mu^- + \bar{\nu}_\mu\) is possible, suggesting a mechanism involving the decay of a down quark into an up quark via a \(W^-\) boson.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of checking conservation laws such as baryon number, lepton number, and charge, questioning whether the proposed decay satisfies these requirements.
  • Some participants argue that energy conservation may be a concern, with one noting that the energy available in the decay is insufficient to create a quark-antiquark pair.
  • Discussion includes calculations of available energy in the decay process, with one participant calculating the total energy available after accounting for the masses of the decay products.
  • There is mention of alternative decay modes, such as \(\pi^+ \rightarrow \pi^0 + e^+ + \nu\), which are energetically allowed but occur very rarely.
  • One participant questions the feasibility of distributing energy among the decay products in a three-body decay scenario, suggesting that if no free energy remains, the particles could remain stationary.
  • Another participant suggests that the quark-antiquark pair might go via a neutral pion and discusses the implications of isospin and branching ratios for different decay modes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of the proposed decay, with some supporting the idea that conservation laws are satisfied while others raise concerns about energy availability. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the possibility of the three-particle pion decay.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various conservation laws and energy constraints without reaching a consensus on the viability of the proposed decay. The discussion includes calculations and theoretical considerations that may depend on specific assumptions about particle interactions and energy distributions.

Derivator
Messages
147
Reaction score
0
hi,

is the following decay possible?

[tex]\pi^- \rightarrow u \bar{u} + \mu^- + \bar{\nu}_\mu[/tex]

my idea: the quark content of [tex]\pi^-[/tex] is [tex]\bar u d[/tex] , the d quark could decay into an up-quark, emitting a [tex]w^-[/tex] boson which decays into the muon and anti-muon-neutrino.

or is there any problem?

(normally, you only see this decay: [tex]\pi^- \rightarrow \mu^- + \bar{\nu}_\mu[/tex] listed)

--derivator
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, have you already checked to make sure the reaction conserves baryon number, lepton number, strangeness, etc.? If not, make sure the reaction satisfies all of the requirements, because from what you have shown in your post it doesn't look like you've tried that yet.
 
as far as I can see, its all conserved:

-there are no baryons -> baryon number trivially conserved
-lepptonnumber is 0 on both sides
- there are no strange quarks involved -> conserved
- charge is conserved
 
I would say that all looks conserved, except maybe for conservation of energy. Check to see if the annihilation of up and antiup quarks produces a nonconservation of energy.
 
In charged pion decay to a muon and neutrino, there is only about 33.91 MeV energy available: the muon gets about 4 MeV and the neutrino gets about 30 MeV. There is insufficient energy for a quark-antiquark pair.

Bob S
 
Ya, that's what I was trying to get Derivator to do.
 
At the end of the day, you need to do something with the quark-antiquark pair you created. You have two options - they can bind to form a neutral pion, or they can annihilate to form a photon. The first, as pointed out, is not energetically allowed with a muon. It is, however, energetically allowed with an electron, and the following decay occurs (but very rarely - about 11 times per billion decays):

[tex]\pi^+ \rightarrow \pi^0 + e^+ + \nu[/tex]

The decay with a photon is much more common, but of course the only thing that's observable is the final state - we don't (and can't) know whether the photon is from annihilation, or if it's from radiation off the incoming pion or outgoing muon.
 
so beta decay, in contrast, is possible, beacuse the electron is way lighter than for example the muon?

Which energy is avaible in beta-decay to create the up-quark, electron and neutrino? only the invariant-mass of the down-quark. if so, which mass? the mass of the "naked" current up quark, or the mass of the constituent up-quark?

-----------------------------------------------------------------
@Bob S
back to three-particle pion decay:
(all masses/energies only approx)

pion mass: 140 Mev
mass of both up quark: 6 Mev
mass of Muon: 106 Mev
neutrino mass: negligible

so (140-106-6)Mev=28Mev is left. why should there be any energy problem?
 
Last edited:
Neither - the energy available is the mass of the parent (which must exceed the mass of the daughters).
 
  • #10
Derivator said:
@Bob S
back to three-particle pion decay:
(all masses/energies only approx)

pion mass: 140 Mev
mass of both up quark: 6 Mev
mass of Muon: 106 Mev
neutrino mass: negligible

so (140-106-6)Mev=28Mev is left. why should there be any energy problem?
The problem is not the total available energy (33.91 MeV), but the energy available to recoiling particles with mass. Because of the neutrino's (near?) zero mass in pi-mu decay and the requirement to conserve momentum, the recoil muon kinetic energy is only about 4 MeV**, with the neutrino taking away nearly 30 MeV. So there probably isn't sufficient energy available for the additional quark-antiquark pair. A better possibility is to look at the 2-body decay process pi -> electron + neutrino (branching ratio about 1 x 10-4) and the 3-body process pi -> electron + neutrino + gamma (branching ratio about 1.6 x 10-7). Both these decay modes have much more free energy.

Bob S

**[added] In 2-body pion -> muon+ neutrino decay at rest, the muon kinetic energy is

Tmuon = [(Mpic2)2 + (Mμc2)2]/(2Mpic2) - Mμc2 = 4.108 MeV

assuming massless neutrino and using present best values for pion and muon masses.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
I understand your calculation for a two body decay. But in a three body decay, why can't I give every particle as much energy as it needs (of course not more than 33.91 MeV in total), so that the sum of there momentum vectors will cancle?

Suppose, there was no free energy left. The three particle just won't move. That's no problem, since the pion had no momentum, too!
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Vanadium-50's suggestion in post #7 may be your best option. The u u -bar quark-antiquark pair must (I think) go via a pi-zero with isospin 1. (There is also an electron-neutrino-gamma decay mode?). Using an effective mass of the pi-zero + electron, the recoil kinetic energy is about 60 KeV. As V-50 says, the branching ratio is ~ 11 per billion.

Bob S
 
  • #13
I see!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
7K