Is Torque Determined by Centripetal or Tangential Acceleration?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Haynes Kwon
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between torque and acceleration, specifically whether torque is determined by centripetal or tangential acceleration. Participants explore the definitions and implications of these types of acceleration in the context of torque calculations, including mathematical derivations and conceptual clarifications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a derivation of torque as τ = rma and questions whether 'a' refers to centripetal or tangential acceleration.
  • Another participant asserts that 'a' is tangential acceleration and describes it as being perpendicular to centripetal acceleration in circular motion.
  • A later reply seeks clarification on why tangential acceleration is the appropriate consideration.
  • Another participant defines torque as an axial vector quantity and explains its relationship to angular momentum, emphasizing that torque is zero for centripetal forces due to the parallel nature of the vectors involved.
  • Some participants express confusion about the correctness of the relationship τ = mv², with one participant insisting on the definition of torque as a cross product of vectors.
  • Further elaboration includes a discussion on the implications of mass change and the vector components of acceleration in the context of torque.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether torque is determined by centripetal or tangential acceleration, with multiple competing views presented throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants introduce complex mathematical expressions and concepts, which may depend on specific assumptions about motion and force. The discussion includes references to varying definitions and conditions under which torque is calculated, indicating a lack of resolution on these points.

Haynes Kwon
Gold Member
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Since F=Δp/Δt...

Δp=mΔv+vΔm, Δm=0
Δp=mΔv

Therefore, Δp/Δt=mΔv/Δt=ma.
And if I multiply 'r' to both sides

rF=rma, which is τ=rma

My question is: is 'a' centripetal acceleration or is it tangential acceleration?
If 'a' is centripetal acceleration, which is v^2/r, τ=rmv^2/r=mv^2?

Also I don't really get what tangential acceleration is...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Haynes Kwon said:
Since F=Δp/Δt...

Δp=mΔv+vΔm, Δm=0
Δp=mΔv

Therefore, Δp/Δt=mΔv/Δt=ma.
And if I multiply 'r' to both sides

rF=rma, which is τ=rma

My question is: is 'a' centripetal acceleration or is it tangential acceleration?
Tangential

Haynes Kwon said:
Also I don't really get what tangential acceleration is...
Perpendicular to centripetal (if the path is a circle).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Haynes Kwon
Thank you very much. But may I ask why?
 
The torque is an axial vector quantity, i.e., it is defined by
$$\vec{\tau}=\vec{r} \times \vec{F}.$$
Here, ##\vec{r}## is the radius vector from a fixed point (with respect to which you want to calculate the torque) and ##\vec{F}## the force acting on the particle. Obviously the torque is perpendicular to the plane spanned by ##\vec{r}## and ##\vec{F}##, and it's 0 whenever ##\vec{F} \propto \vec{r}##.

Defining the angular momentum as
$$\vec{L}=\vec{r} \times \vec{p}=m \vec{r} \times \dot{\vec{r}},$$
you get
$$\dot{\vec{L}}=m \dot{\vec{r}} \times \dot{\vec{r}}+m \vec{r} \times \ddot{\vec{r}}=m \vec{r} \times \ddot{\vec{r}}=\vec{r} \times \vec{F}=\vec{\tau}.$$

Particularly this shows that for central forces, i.e., for ##\vec{F} \propto \vec{r}## the angular momentum is conserved.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Haynes Kwon
Thank you so much.
So you mean that τ=mv^2 is correct?
 
No. I said ##\vec{\tau}=\vec{r} \times \vec{F}##!
 
vanhees71 said:
No. I said ##\vec{\tau}=\vec{r} \times \vec{F}##!
Perhaps I can help clarify to @Haynes Kwon . When the symbol ## \times ## is used between two vectors, it means vector cross product. If the two vectors are parallel or anti-parallel, the result is zero. The two vectors get the maximum cross product when they are perpendicular. In the case of an object moving in a circle, the centripetal force (## F=\frac{mv^2}{r} ##) supplies zero torque because ## \vec{r} \times \vec{F}=0 ##. The vectors ## \vec{r} ## and ## \vec{F} ## lie along the same line=they are anti-parallel, so their vector coss product is zero. Note: For a vector cross product, ## | \vec{A} \times \vec{B} |=|\vec{A}||\vec{B}|sin(\theta) ## where ## \theta ## is the angle between the two vectors.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Haynes Kwon and vanhees71
Haynes Kwon said:
Since F=Δp/Δt...

Δp=mΔv+vΔm, Δm=0
Δp=mΔv

Therefore, Δp/Δt=mΔv/Δt=ma.
And if I multiply 'r' to both sides

rF=rma, which is τ=rma

My question is: is 'a' centripetal acceleration or is it tangential acceleration?
If 'a' is centripetal acceleration, which is v^2/r, τ=rmv^2/r=mv^2?

Also I don't really get what tangential acceleration is...
[1st point]
We have:
\vec {Δp} =m( \vec Δv )+ ( \vec v )Δm, Δm=/=0, Δm="change in mass".
We can hypothesise that this "transfer of mass"Δm[x]+"change in internal mass distribution"Δm[r], in general.
So, we may have Δm=0 superficially, but Δm=Δm[x]+Δm[r] , in reality. (x='linear measure', r='radial measure')
To clarify, there may be cases Δm=Δm[x] [ii] Δm=Δm[r] [iii] Δm=0.

[2nd point]
Considering case [iii], (which makes sense for circular motion as the mass always returns to the same point):

We take the 'cross product' between the 'pair of vectors': \tilde P={ \vec r , \vec F } ;
such that: \vec r X \vec F = |r| |F| sin(θ) ( \hat n ) , where \hat n ="unit normal vector" to \tilde P .

So, for case [iii], we really have: \tilde τ = |r| |F| sin(θ) ( \hat n ) = |r| m|a| sin(θ) ( \hat n )
The acceleration resultant is comes from the vector addition of nutational (3d only), centripetal 'r' and tangential 'θ' components. We will consider only the latter 2 components, thus: \vec a = \vec a r + \vec a θ

From Newton's Principia, we have:
\vec a r = \dot v θ = \frac { \vec dv θ } {dt} = ( \frac v 2 , R ) \hat r ; with variable R=|r| , v=| \vec v θ | = ωR
and \vec a_θ = \dot{ \vec v r } = \frac { d \vec v r } {dt}.

We could put \vec v r = 0 for circular motion, or ; for simple harmonic motion r could vary sinusoidally wrt t,
so that: r= r 0 sin ( ω r t ) ,
and: vec v r = \frac { \vec r} {dt} =\frac {d ( r 0 sin ( ω r t ) \hat r )} {dt}
⇒ vec v r = ω r r 0 cos ( ω r t ) \hat r +r 0 sin ( ω r t) \frac { d \hat r } {dt}
... substitute \hat r = \vec r / |r| and work out the derivative wrt t , then find \dot{ \vec v r }

By letting |a|=a , we have: \tilde τ = R m a sin(θ) ( \hat n )
The centripetal component can be considered transversal as it varies 'up and down'.

We get a from the sum of the squares of the transversal and tangential components.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K