Centripetal acceleration derivation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of the centripetal acceleration formula \( a = \frac{v^2}{r} \) as presented in Feynman's "Six Not-So-Easy Pieces." Participants explore the mathematical and conceptual aspects of the derivation, addressing specific points of confusion regarding the treatment of angles and velocities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the meaning of the velocity \( v \) referenced by Feynman.
  • Another participant suggests that \( v \) refers to the net resultant velocity.
  • Concerns are raised about the multiplication of an angle \( \Delta \theta \) by a velocity \( v \) and how this relates to deriving acceleration.
  • A participant explains that an angle is dimensionless, being a ratio of arc length to radius, allowing for multiplication with other quantities.
  • There is a discussion about the angle being measured in radians and its implications in the context of the derivation.
  • One participant introduces the relationship between arc length and angle in the context of circular motion.
  • Mathematical expressions are presented to illustrate the derivation of the perpendicular component of velocity.
  • Another participant references the Frenet-Serret formulas to discuss the acceleration of a point moving along a curve.
  • Some participants express confusion regarding the technical details presented, indicating a lack of understanding of the advanced concepts introduced.
  • There is a mention of a forum rule about providing hints rather than full solutions, prompting questions about the rationale behind this guideline.
  • One participant notes that the formula being derived is a special case of a more general principle applicable to any spatial curve.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and agreement on the mathematical treatment of angles and velocities. Some participants provide clarifications, while others remain confused, indicating that the discussion contains multiple competing views and unresolved questions.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the need for a deeper understanding of the underlying theory to fully grasp the derivation, suggesting that assumptions and definitions may not be fully articulated in the discussion.

Andreas C
Messages
196
Reaction score
20
Ok, so I'm a bit confused by the derivation of a=v^2/r in Feynman's "Six Not-So-Easy Pieces".

In pages 17-18, it is stated that "The other component of acceleration, at right angles to the curve, is easy to calculate, using Figures 1-7 and 1-8. In the short time Δt let the change in angle between v1 and v2 be the small angle Δθ. If the magnitude of the velocity is called v, then of course Δv ┴ = vΔθ and the acceleration a will be a┴ = v(Δθ/Δt).".

1) What velocity does he refer to by v?
2) How can he multiply Δθ (an angle) by v (a magnitude of a velocity)?
3) (Probably the same as 2) How can he divide Δθ by Δt?

I haven't read the rest of the book, so maybe that's where the answer is? I don't know, it seems very weird.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Andreas C said:
1) What velocity does he refer to by v?
the net resultant velocity

Andreas C said:
2) How can he multiply Δθ (an angle) by v (a magnitude of a velocity)?
the same you multiply mass by acceleration to get force
Andreas C said:
3) (Probably the same as 2) How can he divide Δθ by Δt?
same way you divide distance by time to get speed
 
hackhard said:
the net resultant velocitythe same you multiply mass by acceleration to get force

same way you divide distance by time to get speed

Yeah, but he multiplies speed by an angle, and he gets velocity! How? And then he divides an angle with time, and multiplies it by speed, and gets acceleration!
 
An angle is a ratio of two length and thus itself dimensionless, namely arclength of the section of a circle divided by the radius of the circle. So any quantity multiplied by an angle is another quantity with the same dimension as the one you multiplied with the angle.
 
Ah, I think I am beginning to understand! So this angle would be measured in radians, not degrees, right? But what does this achieve though? What does multiplying an angle by speed achieve in this context?
 
When you rotate the radius by an angle θ, the arc described by the tip of the radius is s=Rθ.
Here the radius is v and the angle is very small so the cord and the arc are assumed the same thing.
 
New_Bitmap_Image.png

$$\triangle{v(\bot)}=\sqrt{v1^{2}+v2^{2}-2\cdot{v1}\cdot{v2}\cdot{cos(\triangle\theta)}}\cdot{cos(\triangle\theta/2)}$$
=$$\sqrt{2v^{2}-2v^{2}\cdot{cos(\triangle\theta)}}\sqrt{\frac{1+cos(\triangle\theta)}{2}}$$
=$$v\sqrt{1-{cos(\triangle\theta)}^{2}}$$
=$$v\cdot{sin(\triangle\theta)}$$
=$$v\triangle\theta$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Andreas C
Oh thanks, I get it now!
 
speaking as adults when kids have gone to bed... :)

Let ##\boldsymbol r=\boldsymbol r(s)## be the space curve parameterized by arc-length parameter ##s##. And let ##\boldsymbol{T}(s),\boldsymbol{N}(s),\boldsymbol{B}(s)## be the Frenet frame. By ##\kappa(s),\tau(s)## denote the curvature and torsion respectively. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frenet–Serret_formulas
Assume that a point ##A## moves on the curve and its law of motion is ##s=s(t)##.

Theorem. The acceleration of the point ##A## is given by the formula ##\boldsymbol a_A=\ddot s\boldsymbol T+\dot s^2\kappa\boldsymbol{N}.##

(It follows immediately from the Frenet-Serret formulas by differentiating the following equality ##\boldsymbol v_A=\dot r=\dot s\boldsymbol T.##
 
  • #10
hackhard said:
New_Bitmap_Image.png

$$\triangle{v(\bot)}=\sqrt{v1^{2}+v2^{2}-2\cdot{v1}\cdot{v2}\cdot{cos(\triangle\theta)}}\cdot{cos(\triangle\theta/2)}$$
=$$\sqrt{2v^{2}-2v^{2}\cdot{cos(\triangle\theta)}}\sqrt{\frac{1+cos(\triangle\theta)}{2}}$$
=$$v\sqrt{1-{cos(\triangle\theta)}^{2}}$$
=$$v\cdot{sin(\triangle\theta)}$$
=$$v\triangle\theta$$
Note that it is a rule on the Forums to give hints and not full solutions.
 
  • #11
wrobel said:
speaking as adults when kids have gone to bed... :)

Let ##\boldsymbol r=\boldsymbol r(s)## be the space curve parameterized by arc-length parameter ##s##. And let ##\boldsymbol{T}(s),\boldsymbol{N}(s),\boldsymbol{B}(s)## be the Frenet frame. By ##\kappa(s),\tau(s)## denote the curvature and torsion respectively. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frenet–Serret_formulas
Assume that a point ##A## moves on the curve and its law of motion is ##s=s(t)##.

Theorem. The acceleration of the point ##A## is given by the formula ##\boldsymbol a_A=\ddot s\boldsymbol T+\dot s^2\kappa\boldsymbol{N}.##

(It follows immediately from the Frenet-Serret formulas by differentiating the following equality ##\boldsymbol v_A=\dot r=\dot s\boldsymbol T.##

Uh... I have no idea what you just said, but thanks I guess...
 
  • #12
nrqed said:
Note that it is a rule on the Forums to give hints and not full solutions.

It is? Why?
 
  • #13
Andreas C said:
Uh... I have no idea what you just said, but thanks I guess...
I said that the formula you are trying to derive is a special case of the general fact which is valid for any spatial curve not only for circle. And it takes one line to deduce that general formula
 
Last edited:
  • #14
wrobel said:
I said that the formula you are trying to derive is a special case of the general fact which is valid for any spatial curve not only for circle. And it takes one line to deduce that general formula

Ah ok. But it only takes one line given that you know the rest of the theory behind it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
11K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
962
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K